• MimicJar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    emblematic of a bigger problem

    Article goes on to say that the show just sucks.

    The successful spinoffs mentioned aren’t successful because they’re a “trusted” IP with a big fan following. They successful because they’re good. Sure having a fan base helps, but you have to make something good first.

    An existing show can linger on for many years because it has a big fan following, but those folks aren’t likely to follow something new if that new thing sucks.

    Suits LA could have worked. We have medical dramas. We have police dramas. We could have more lawyer dramas.

    A show sucking isn’t emblematic of a bigger problem, it’s the same problem that always existed.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Did a better job explaining it than that entire “article”. Hollywood just doesn’t want to listen. We love our franchises because they were good. They have a following because they were good. Hollywood insists that to be risky you only get a small budget, so they’re scrappy and take risks, fans love it, and it takes off. Unfortunately suits somehow always miss the whole bit about how it was the risky and daring story telling that brought fans in, and just drop that in later seasons for safe feelgoods, and so it’s just boring.

      Let the writers free. Stop writing by committee and just let them do their thing. No more marketing teams, no more legals, no more “we’ll lose men 18-25” people. If you make it good, they will come