geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 2 months agoBernie Sanders gets fact checkedlemmy.mlimagemessage-square153fedilinkarrow-up1508arrow-down1105
arrow-up1403arrow-down1imageBernie Sanders gets fact checkedlemmy.mlgeneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square153fedilink
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up45arrow-down24·2 months agoPeak what-about-ism
minus-squareGold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down4·2 months agoits whataboutism to point out a flaw in ones argument?
minus-squareRickC137@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down6·2 months agoWhataboutism is: “You said x but what about y?” Which doesn’t make x any less valid or problematic.
minus-squareanarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoImplying that the US chooses foreign support on the basis of democratic principles is misleading at-best It’s like me telling my doctor that I have a glass of wine a day, even though I also have a bottle of whiskey a day.
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down39·2 months agoPeak virtue signalling.
minus-squareformulaBonk@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down2·2 months agoEven if you disagree with what that guy wrote it’s not in any way virtue signaling. Like brother what?
Peak what-about-ism
its whataboutism to point out a flaw in ones argument?
Whataboutism is: “You said x but what about y?” Which doesn’t make x any less valid or problematic.
Implying that the US chooses foreign support on the basis of democratic principles is misleading at-best
It’s like me telling my doctor that I have a glass of wine a day, even though I also have a bottle of whiskey a day.
Peak virtue signalling.
Even if you disagree with what that guy wrote it’s not in any way virtue signaling. Like brother what?