“Not enough shooting” feels like the most common criticism of any team in the league, both from analysts and fans. I was thinking today, how many teams are actually satisfied with the amount of shooting that they can put on the floor in a lineup that is generally capable if not perfect otherwise? My list is quite short:
Boston Denver Phoenix
Am I wrong that basically everyone is dissatisfied with how much shooting is on their team’s roster?
Mavs too. A lot of shooting, but shitty defense.
I did last year when we could play four out around Rob. I was clearly mistaken. But this year!
You’re not wrong. It’s the same syndrome NBA fans have with wanting every player that isn’t a star on their team to be a 3 and D player when they don’t realize those are hard to find and are usually paid well for a reason
It’s why someone like Cam Reddish will continue to get chances despite only being bad.
Luka Kyrie Josh Green THJ Grant Seth Hardy Kleber is enough shooting i think
I think we’re good
Based off one game, the Thunder. Until proven otherwise /s
I think switchable defenders with length are a higher priority for most teams. There are plenty of really excellent shooters that can’t make an NBA roster.
I think Memphis will, once Ja is back on that glock er block.
7/7 by Chris Mullen tonight. Just excellent shooting here tonight by Mullen.
Are they still doing mid range shots like Bird, Iverson and Mahmoud ?