Interested in anyone who knows about this company (they have a lot of ML hiring listings right now). Basically wondering if it’s worth exploring more. They have apparently raised $240mln and are a unicorn so this is an important topic.

Here is the summary of some red flags I have found:

  1. Founders have no ML background

  2. Zero released product after several years despite huge funding.

  3. TC article says founded 2021, but every listing claims it is YC2017. One of the founders did a recruiting service from YC 2017, but Imbue is a totally unrelated company with a different founding group so claiming YC affiliation seems dubious/unethical. YC is also not named as an investor in the company anywhere on their website.

  4. No-one I have spoken to has ever worked with them/ heard of them outside press

  5. Claim to have raised $240mln, but not clear who from. Named investors on recent $200mln round are “Astera Institute, NVIDIA, Cruise CEO Kyle Vogt, Notion co-founder Simon Last and others” which seems like a random group and there is no named lead. As a matter of fact, there is not a single VC named anywhere in their marketing as an investor which would be very unusual for a SF AI startup that has raised >$200mln. Crunchbase also has no VCs/institutional investors recorded. I couldn’t find any investor that I would expect to have done significant due diligence. A month after they raised $200mln, they prominently announced that they raised another $12mln from Amazon Alexa and Eric Schmidt - this seems like a pure publicity stunt to me. This announcement of an extra 5% in round funding got a bunch of press articles about it also. They push the press angle incredibly hard.

  6. Their CEO has been in the press claiming that they buy their own chips, and they also claim to have a 10k H100 stack, but they literally haven’t raised enough funding to buy that many H100s. Maybe they are renting and all the press about buying is just press?

  7. The press/publicity to product ratio is extremely high. Dozens of articles in major publications with nothing released and no claimed customers.

  8. Their site is full of gushy statements with no detail like “We pretrain very large (>100B parameter) models, optimized for internal reasoning benchmarks.” (internal reasoning benchmarks is a great way to pretend you have competitive models!) and “Our north star: truly personal computers that give us freedom, dignity, and agency to do what we love”. As far as I can tell, Imbue has never released even a 3B or 7B open source model like a bunch of similar startups have.

  9. Their “Our Work” blog that should showcase their research and products contains 4 articles from 2023. 2 of them are opinion pieces on LLM ethics that contain no technical details, 1 is a niche piece on RL in hyperparameter search, and 1 discusses SSL on ResNet50 - a 23mln param CNN that is 5,000 times smaller than the LLMs they are apparently training.


Of course red flags are just that - suggestions of a problem not evidence. Inflection is in a similar boat on many of the above points - their only public product is the inferior Pi model - but at least they have serious industry heavyweights in their management and research so I give them the benefit of the doubt.

So, to those in the know - is this a real company? Has it duped a bunch of rich individuals? Is it worth spending more time on?

  • BeginningCandidate24@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    no product, no research, yet raised $200 million at a >$1 billion valuation

    Anthropic, Cohere, Inflection, Adept and Mistral went through the same steps. All are real companies that eventually put out a product.

    cc u/Witty-Elk2052

    • learn-deeply@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      All the companies that were listed have put out products and research within 5 years of being founded, and they all have had founders with previous relevant experience shipping products and models.

      • BeginningCandidate24@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Imbue was basically inactive during their first 3-4 years and the 200+ million investment was made last month. The companies I listed started shipping after they received investor money. It makes sense in context.

        • learn-deeply@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They raised $20 million a year ago and was funded by YC in 2017. Anyway, I don’t have a dog in the fight. When investors inevitably lose their money I’ll probably feel some schraudenfreude for a few seconds and get on with my day.