• KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If it’s that vital, surely you would do it to yourself?

    You can’t really do the kind of experiments being done genetically modifying growing infants on yourself, I imagine. Not that that should be an excuse, of course.

    • Nursery2787@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You can work your way through all the different animal models, showing that you have a clear understanding of every single bio mechanism. Then start off with a small change to a human baby THAT WOULD OBVIOUSLY BENEFIT showing that nothing bad happens. Like we figured out this specific sequence leads to deformed hands, we have plenty of control babies with the deformed hands.

      By this guys own logic, he didn’t even get usable fucking data. Crispr changes DNA, yeah no shit we all knew that. He gave them a slight boost to HIV. How the fuck are we supposed to find out without exposing them. A high likelihood that they would have grown up never worrying about HIV in the first place.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The babies were born to HIV infected fathers, so the part about “never worrying about HIV in the first place” isn’t quite accurate.

        But honestly, that makes it even more infuriating. There probably would have been patients that would have CONSENTED to this if given the opportunity. He probably could have done things the right way - worked with animal studies, gone through the ethics process.

        Instead, he decided to move fast and break things, without regard for others autonomy or consent.