• silverlose@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Have you heard of ollama? You can run deepseek and stuff locally super easy. I know it’s not a complete replacement, but it feels nice to use an LLM guilt free. I’ve compared the 14b distilled model from deepseek vs the paid version of ChatGPT and it made me cancel my account.

    • tupalos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      What do you use to run it locally? If there was something that could use speech to text reliably to be able to use a open source option, I consider switching.

      • silverlose@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        FWIW speech to text works really well on Apple stuff.

        I’m not exactly sure what info you’re looking but: my gaming PC is headless and sits in a closet. I run ollama on that and I connect to it using a client called “ChatBox”. It’s got a gtx 3060 which fits the whole model, so it’s reasonably fast. I’ve tried the 32b model and it does work but slowly.

        Honestly, ollama was so easy to setup, if you have any experience with computers I recommend giving it a shot. (Could be a great excuse to get a new gpu 😉)

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would prefer to run my ais locally, but my brain glazes over if I see github. I found a a program called “gpt4all”, but it’s very limited in what models it can run, and what I could get just wasn’t as good for my use case as openai’s 4o model. Also, being able to generate images in the same conversation as text work is a feature that I’m fairly certain no other ai model can do (yet).

      • silverlose@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think whats really happening behind the scenes is that the model you’re talking to makes a function call to another model that generates the image.

        I haven’t seen it either so if you want that and don’t want to code it might be best to stick with paid, but something like that could easily exist somewhere else.

        • glitchdx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I bet you’re right, but the fact that I never see it is a feature worth paying for, especially for a smooth-brain like myself.