Escalating rhetoric comes as new study shows there’s just six years left to keep global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius at current CO2 emissions rate

Graph showing increasing use of 'climate emergency' in academic literature from 7 examples in 2008 to 96 in 2018 to 862 uses in 2002.

  • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There is no avoiding 1.5c — achieving it is predicated on lies; carbon offsets (accounting trick to continue emissions) and carbon capture (won’t be viable for at least 50+ years, after we’re already at 2-4c).

    The oligarchy, and their corporations, are LYING to you so they can continue profiteering all the way up until the shit hits the fan. If they were honest about the reality of the situation, they’d have to genuinely worry about guillotines. Right now we need to focus on avoiding 3c, because 2c is also likely unavoidable, even if we were spending triple on decarbonisation than we are right now.

    All renewables to date have only dampened emissions from humanities increasing energy consumption. We’ve still emitted 25% of all CO2 since the year 2000, and are still emitting the most in history per annum. If we continue at the current peak, we’ll add another 25% in 15 years. There are still 700+ million ICE cars on the road, still thousands of diesel container ships emitting more than all those cars combined; still tens of thousands of coal, gas, and oil power plants. All of that can’t simply be “replaced”. It will take dozens of trillions in capital across decades, and we’ll have to consume significantly more energy to mine and manufacture all the renewable tech to replace them — energy that will still mostly come from fossil fuels.

    • Ordoabchao@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      We are boned and Earth is going to ice-age us, eventually. After raising the sea level and flooding many inhabitated areas, turning arable land into desert while our weather system takes a dive.

      Winter hasn’t even properly set in where I live, and it’s basically November. It’s still 13c outside…

  • neanderthal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    If we don’t start turning things around rapidly, global warming is going to be saying to WW2: “You think YOU are the master of death, despair, suffering, and destruction? Hold my beer and watch this!”

    • bloopernova@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m slightly more optimistic now than I have been. I recently learned that economic growth will be stalled soon. I think that the big money interests will demand that growth continue, which necessitates mitigating the climate crisis effects if not the cause.

      It’s still going to be a horrifically shitty time for 99.9% of humanity, but I don’t think we’re going extinct.

      • neanderthal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m slightly optimistic.

        What we really need is a widely recognized and transparent organization to lead the effort. Like the red cross for blood donations. I’ve looked at various groups, but they tend to be opaque regarding funding. The transparency is vital because without it, we could be easily misled into supporting a group that is created by say oil companies designed to have us chasing red herrings.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Death … Especially death of hundreds or thousands

    No one cares until people, lots of people start dying … because it implies that everyone is at risk of getting killed by these events.

    In the meantime, when there’s just damaged houses and people calling in their insurances … it’s all just a curiosity and a neat headline.

    No one will care until we see the death toll rise

    • Sonori@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      You know, i used to think that too. Then Covid happened and it turned out that even more americans dying every few days than did during 9/11 from an easily preventable disease still saw outright denial and anger at anyone who took even the simplest and smallest of precautions.

  • iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s no stopping this trend without nuclear energy. Renewable are great, but they can replace nuclear in 100 years. We need nuclear power now to replace greenhouse gas polluting power plants.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      People are deploying much more renewables than nuclear because they’re cheaper for the first ~80% of decarbonization. Nuclear might get used for the last 20% if it can be done more cheaply than large amounts of storage.

    • Black616Angel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh yes, nuclear!

      THE fast solution for energy. It only takes like 20 years to build a plant, but what are 20 years if you talk stupid shit for “in 100 years”?

  • Auzy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unfortunately, I don’t see this changing. Unfortunately, too many people feel the need to peacock, and act like dickheads simply to try to stand out.

    And a lot of those dickheads also chose to not pay attention during high school, so they overcompensate for making a lot of noise about their “evidence”, which isn’t based on critical thinking.