cm0002@lemmy.world to Python@programming.dev · 1 month agoPython now has a standard package lock file format – though winning full adoption will be a challengedevclass.comexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1121arrow-down13
arrow-up1118arrow-down1external-linkPython now has a standard package lock file format – though winning full adoption will be a challengedevclass.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Python@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squareEager Eagle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoHave you tried hatch? I don’t know why people are still bothering with setuptools for new projects.
minus-squarelogging_strict@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoFrom the hatch docs, not seeing where it discusses publishing to alternative package warehouses.
minus-squareEager Eagle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 month agoAFAIK setuptools and hatch are for building. Publishing is a different process. You can try uv for publishing, but idk if it supports publishing to alternatives to PyPI.
minus-squarelogging_strict@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agosetuptools is for enforcing a cartel, naively can simplify that to for building. I hope uv completely replaces setuptools and build. Then the maintainers can move on to another racket.
Have you tried hatch?
I don’t know why people are still bothering with setuptools for new projects.
Will look at it again
From the hatch docs, not seeing where it discusses publishing to alternative package warehouses.
AFAIK setuptools and hatch are for building. Publishing is a different process. You can try
uvfor publishing, but idk if it supports publishing to alternatives to PyPI.setuptools is for enforcing a cartel, naively can simplify that to
for building.I hope uv completely replaces setuptools and build. Then the maintainers can move on to another racket.