Jason Novinger@programming.devM to Python@programming.dev · 15 hours agoPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.comexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up138arrow-down14cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up134arrow-down1external-linkPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.comJason Novinger@programming.devM to Python@programming.dev · 15 hours agomessage-square19fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareEphera@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 hours agoYeah, my stance for both of those is the same: If the complexity aids you in communicating better, then use it. But if you’re using big words where small words would do, then you’re doing a disservice to your readers.
Yeah, my stance for both of those is the same: If the complexity aids you in communicating better, then use it. But if you’re using big words where small words would do, then you’re doing a disservice to your readers.