dohpaz42@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 day agoAny ideas what these signs on this building mean?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1108arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1104arrow-down1imageAny ideas what these signs on this building mean?lemmy.mldohpaz42@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square32fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-221 hours agoSure, but I don’t think the building should have two labels. I think it should have one label that reflects a warning for everything in the building. Imagine you have a crate with two different chemicals. The chemicals are in different bottles so they aren’t mixed, and each bottle has its own label. Should the crate have two unidentified labels like this, or one? There’s no indication what those labels refer to on the building.
minus-squaredesktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 hours agoif the chemicals are extremely different in hazard it could be useful to know that it’s not a mixture, like a superacid and a strong base.
I’m sure they’ll be labelled inside too.
Sure, but I don’t think the building should have two labels. I think it should have one label that reflects a warning for everything in the building.
Imagine you have a crate with two different chemicals. The chemicals are in different bottles so they aren’t mixed, and each bottle has its own label.
Should the crate have two unidentified labels like this, or one? There’s no indication what those labels refer to on the building.
if the chemicals are extremely different in hazard it could be useful to know that it’s not a mixture, like a superacid and a strong base.