• Bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most of these people are over paid actually. Making without stock over 150k and then around the same in RSUs or more.

    The issue is many folks were only doing like 3 or 4 hr a day and then double dipped to collect another paycheck because they had the time to. I don’t necessarily fault them.

    Friend of mine intentionally took a boring bank job making like 50k less than he was making (so around $125k a yr) so he could coast as a high performer there then planned and did find another gig in Pacific time (were east Coast) and then pulled two checks and still only worked like 42 hr a week.

    This is the true reason there making work from home optional.

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are they overpaid, or is every other job underpaid? Seems weird to call them overpaid when the company is making a profit on them anyway.

      • WallEx@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Huh? If the job can be done this fast and the contract says, you get this money for doing that, why should that be wrong, meaning why should anyone be unhappy?

        Except companies are just in for the money and would rather pay you less … Hmmm

        • quicksand@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          All I can say is I agree with you; however, lots of contracts have you agree that you only work for that company while you’re employed by them

          • WallEx@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I think mine has a clause too, that requires me to at least inform my employee

            • quicksand@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s the point of the clause; to fire people who tell them they’re working a second full-time job. When required to be in office everywhere it becomes quite obvious very quickly. They’re upset they can’t tell if you’re two-timing or not if you work from home, so they want to make sure you come in and work for them

              • WallEx@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                1 year ago

                Petty tactics from petty people. If someone is doing the job they are paid for, why bother? It’s like the employers are entitled to the 40 hours or something, even if all the work is done.

                • phillaholic@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If someone is doing the job they are paid for,

                  They aren’t if they aren’t available because they are working the second job. I question how many people saying this are actually salaried workers who’ve read their employment agreements.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          and the contract says, you get this money for doing that

          Almost certainly the contract doesn’t say this tho.

          • WallEx@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mine does. But I’m not working manual labor, so it definitely can and will differ I guess

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Is that a job you could get away with working 2 at the same time remotely?

              • WallEx@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not really, maybe this one and a half time job or sth, I work 4-8 hours a day depending on what’s happening (I work in it)

                • phillaholic@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  And if you’re working on something for the second job, do you have to drop it if something comes up with the first one? Does the second job know you’re going to be doing that?

                  • WallEx@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Where did I say, that I have a second job? I don’t, so that’s that.