So there detect pretrain data, https://swj0419.github.io/detect-pretrain.github.io/ , where one can test if a model has been pretrained on the text or not, so why dont we just test all the models going on the leaderboard, and just reject those detected for pretrain data? It would end the “train on test” issue

  • ambient_temp_xeno@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s all a rabbit hole of time wasting, imho. People judge x or y model on how well it works for their use cases.

    • ninjasaid13@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s all a rabbit hole of time wasting, imho. People judge x or y model on how well it works for their use cases.

      Well people don’t want to be falsely advertised on the capabilities of the model, if it’s only good on certain use cases, then just say it.

  • mcmoose1900@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ask on the huggingface leaderboard page!

    The HF staff do seem to look at it, and have an interest in weeding out “contaminated” models (as they have already marked a few).