• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    No that’s not accurate. Centralized agricultural planning in pre-soviet Russia was still better than what the Soviets implemented, this was all very well documented that more people died as a result of the changes made.

    • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Centralized agricultural planning in pre-soviet Russia was still better than what the Soviets implemented

      Life expectancy was 28 years old before the Bolsheviks, after the land reforms and WW2 life expectancy rose dramatically to 60, what on Earth are you talking about

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        In 1845 it was 29, in 1920 it was 25, in 1945 it was 23.

        They didnt beat 50 until the USSR had been around for 30 years.

        • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          LMFAO you literally went to the first google link provides on “life expectancy of Russia historic”, the Statista website, and purposefully cherrypicked the two lowest points in the history of the USSR, which coincide with wars they famously didn’t start (first being the civil war, second being WW2).

          Why not pick 1930, the second year since land collectivization began, with the 37 years of life expectancy already (higher than at any point during Tsarism)? Why not pick 1940 with 41.5 years of life expectancy before Nazis invaded the USSR and murdered 27 million people?

          You’re a fucking joke lmao trying to lie to yourself by cherrypicking the lowest values coinciding with wars imposed on the Soviet Union

          • NSRXN@scribe.disroot.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            isn’ RSA better than aes? i thought aes’ keyspace was only like 56 bits or something.

            edit: i looked it up. aes can take a 256 bit key. i was thinking of DES.

            • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Lmao keep trying, loser, you’re just lying to yourself with your cherrypicking, not anyone else

                • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Loser, keep lying to yourself. You had done exactly 0 research on it, you went to the literal first google link and cherry picked the two data points that suited you. You probably didn’t even know about the fucking Russian civil war, uneducated swine