liberal is center right; and liberalism completely fine with authority, maybe less with authoritarianism per se, but that’s what the “inevitably leads to” part is about. an anti-authoritarian but pro-authority stance will inevitably lead to authoritarianism. just like how cops and military keep getting more and more ridiculous funding despite not demonstrating anything of worth that they contribute to society.
Just associate Liberal with Freedom, that’s why you can be “liberal with the rules” if it’s not strictly enforced. It’s not a political group rather it’s just an English word that is used in political thought
No but see action for the sake of action is fascist
And having interests or a conscience is woke, which is what causes reactionaries to get riled up, so that’s also fascist.
So taking any action to oppose fascism is the most fascist you can possibly be. That’s why the left are the real fascists!
So the only real move that isn’t fascist is for us to reach across the aisle and do brutal bipartisan antifascism to the left. Possibly with some sort of camp system. Maybe we could merge good corporate citizens with the state to make it more efficient.
Weird to see a pro authoritarian post in an anarchy community
it’s not pro-authoritarianism
Liberal is anti authoritarian
Anti liberal = anti anti authoritarian = pro authoritarian
liberals are fine with authority: cops, judges, bosses, and landlords… don’t lie
That’s just because they’re dumb enough to think not doing anything with their own authority is enough
Though Laissez-faire that it derives from felt only landlords should pay taxes because they don’t provide anything to society
so you can see how anti-authoritarians take issue with liberals
liberal is center right; and liberalism completely fine with authority, maybe less with authoritarianism per se, but that’s what the “inevitably leads to” part is about. an anti-authoritarian but pro-authority stance will inevitably lead to authoritarianism. just like how cops and military keep getting more and more ridiculous funding despite not demonstrating anything of worth that they contribute to society.
We are looking at the north south axis not the left right axis
oh no I was looking at the up down and east west axis
Liberalism exists on both east west
The more liberal (free) a person is, the less authoritarian they are
There is no reason for you to be looking east west because it’s shared across that
Sorry, I forgot my compass i’m all turned around
Apparently
Just associate Liberal with Freedom, that’s why you can be “liberal with the rules” if it’s not strictly enforced. It’s not a political group rather it’s just an English word that is used in political thought
Color me surprised - a liberal who doesn’t know what authority is
Not a liberal, just not using the term incorrectly
Well you’re certainly using one of those terms wrong.
No but see action for the sake of action is fascist
And having interests or a conscience is woke, which is what causes reactionaries to get riled up, so that’s also fascist.
So taking any action to oppose fascism is the most fascist you can possibly be. That’s why the left are the real fascists!
So the only real move that isn’t fascist is for us to reach across the aisle and do brutal bipartisan antifascism to the left. Possibly with some sort of camp system. Maybe we could merge good corporate citizens with the state to make it more efficient.
You have correctly understood this, yes. You’re so clever.