• 800XL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Dont fucking use this. Let it lose money so it goes away. Amazon is awful enough and if this shit trend continues, Meta will get into healthcare too using posts, tracking cookies and purchases on the platform too.

      • Zikeji@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        In my opinion, I think that properly done AI assisted doctors are a good thing. Doctors have to keep track of so much stuff that is constantly changing, just to make a diagnosis. AI guidance can and will help.

        Keyword being “properly” which is probably not going to be the case.

    • Sabata11792@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Well after reading your internet history, I diagnosed you with depression.”
      -This session was sponcered by Gold Rope patented pre tied nooses.

      • 800XL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        And your Amazon-sponsored telehealth video chat session will have ads pasted across it like some awful news channel screenshot.

        Seriously tho, every-single webpage you visit tattles to a combo of Amazon, Meta, or Facebook. That means based on your medical history Amazon can just flat out choose not to show you items it deems unhealthy. It will use all of that to build a profile whose sole goal is to lump you into risk categories it will use as a reason to charge more money. Maybe not at first, but once the exercise of figuring out just what kind of data they have on you is complete and how they can leverage it, they will.

    • the_q@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      So if you can’t afford traditional insurance which is 100% a scam then why is this a bad alternative?

      • thefloweracidic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        This isn’t a good alternative either. From reading the article it looks like this service is meant to screen less serious issues, and if those less serious issues need an in person doctor visit, you’ll need insurance.

        The deeper problem is that if our personal data is gold, our medical data is diamonds. It may not be tomorrow, or a decade from now, but I guarantee any sort of contact non-medical corporations make with our medical data will result in a darker dystopia.

        Targeted ads will be more invasive. Insurance premiums can be increased for “unhealthy” purchases. Medical coverage can be denied based on economic decisions. The list can go on. We would pretty much get a more perverse profit driven medical system if companies like Amazon start wiggling their way into medicine. Also regulations won’t keep us safe, you can thank lobbying for that.

      • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Healthcare is already heavily corporatized in the US, this is just another worsening step.

        • Night Monkey@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Have you used this service? Can you tell me if it’s better or worse than other medical services available?

          • treefrog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            A poster above has.

            I don’t trust Amazon to shop with.

            I expect it’s only a matter of time before there’s a huge HIPAA violation when we find out they’re using health info to sell us shit.