Why is there no analog to napster/bittorent/bitcoin with LLMs?

Is there a technical reason that there is not some kind of open source LLM that we can all install on our local host which contributes computing power to answering prompts, and rewards those who contribute computing power by allowing them to enter more prompts?

Obviously, there must be a technical reason which prevents distributed LLMs or else it would have already been created by now.

  • exoticCuriosity@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the primary concern revolves around the security and data privacy of users, given the absence of assurance regarding the safety of your data when operating on a network accessible to anyone, including potential malicious actors.

    I believe implementing an experimental model, wherein users can contribute their GPU for a specific model and receive credits in return, which they can use to use other models instead of downloading Terabytes worth of data

    • sdmat@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, the primary concern is that network latency kills the serial performance of LLMs.

      You can have a distributed llm getting decent throughput in total across many slow generations. You can’t have a distributed LLM with throughput for a single generation competitive to running in a single cluster.