Why is there no analog to napster/bittorent/bitcoin with LLMs?
Is there a technical reason that there is not some kind of open source LLM that we can all install on our local host which contributes computing power to answering prompts, and rewards those who contribute computing power by allowing them to enter more prompts?
Obviously, there must be a technical reason which prevents distributed LLMs or else it would have already been created by now.
It’s terribly inefficient in many ways. Data centers with best GPUs are the most efficient hardware and energy wise. They are often built in places with access to cheap/green energy and subsidies. Also for research/development cash is cheap, so there’s little incentive to play with some decentralized stuff which adds a level of technical abstraction + needing a community. Opportunity cost wayyy outweighs running this in a data center for the vast majority of use cases.
Aren’t there a lot of people who don’t run their GPUs 24/7? That would put the marginal cost of equipment at zero, and electricity costs what, something around $1/W-yr?
Transferring the state over the internet so the next card can take over is sloooow. You’d want cards that can take a lot of layers to minimize that.
In other words, you want few and big gpu’s in the network, not a bunch of small ones.
Yes, for actually dividing models across machines, which was the original idea. I’d shifted to a different (and less technically interesting) question of sharing GPUs without dividing the model.
For dividing training, though, see this paper:
SWARM Parallelism: Training Large Models Can Be Surprisingly Communication-Efficient
Distributed inference IS indeed slower BUT its definitely not too slow for production use. I’ve used it and it’s still faster than GPT4 with the proper cluster.