• DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d really like to at least see humanity fully switch to clean energy in my lifetime but I’m losing hope.

    I should already be able to take a self-driving flying taxi to work. I should already be able to vacation on the moon. We shouldn’t be burning stuff to power all our modern tech.

    I grew up on 80s/90s scifi. I hope humanity can get it’s shit together and that the current anti-intellectualism phase we’re in is just part of a larger cycle.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Flying taxis won’t happen, way too many risks, even in the future, never mind the horrors of having your skies full of that crap.

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        We have auto-pilots for planes, those are mostly fine. People are the problem. I dont trust humans to operate motor vehicles in 2 dimensions, let alone 3…

        • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          To be fair, you have a 1 in 95 chance of dying in an automobile accident.

          Based on modern safety standards for everything else, that’s unacceptable.

          If I offered you a job and said you have a 1 in 95 chance of dying from working this job, you would refuse. The most dangerous job in the USA is logging, with about a 1 in 1000 chance of dying. More lumberjacks die driving home than die working their extremely dangerous job.

          Not only should we have self-driving flying taxis by now, but we should also at least have level 5 self-driving cars so people aren’t constantly dying driving to get groceries or pick up their kids.

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            49 minutes ago

            No

            What we need is more bicycle roads, pedestrian walk ways and public transportation

            Suffice to say that 1 bus is safer than 30 cars but it also generates a shit tonne less pollution, but also keep in mind that the vast majority of car rides are short distance, even in the US

            In the Netherlands they changed everything to prefer bicycles and walking and it’s noticable. It changed architecture. It’s why in the Netherlands there are broad loads of small super markets. Wherever you are within a town you’ll have a super market at walking distance

            Many people there don’t have a car, not because they can’t afford it but because they don’t want one. Cars are expensive, cumbersome, dangerous, and ugly. You won’t see depressing towns there that are 70% concrete roads or parking lots. It’s all beautiful because they got rid of all that, it isn’t needed.

            In before anyone starts about how this can’t be done in the US: it can, and quite easily. Pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure costs a fraction of car infrastructure, it’s easier and faster to build, no parking lots required, you can now make that a store and get taxes from it, it’ll make your cities richer. People get more exercise, they’ll be healthier and happier, there are no downsides. Inclines near mountainous areas? Electrical bikes to the rescue.

            Please please do NOT push this car stuff, especially flying car stuff. It’s not needed, it’s a waste, it’s polluting even when electric, and we have flying cars, they’re called planes and there is a reason why pilots need to learn and train a LOT more than car drivers.

          • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Obviously I know how they work, I saw it in a documentary about Airplanes. The Otto pilot inflates at the press of a button (or is inflated manually) and they fly the plane.