Haliburton said the winner should get a guaranteed playoff spot, which is a nice idea for incentive but probably wouldn’t work because the teams that won could just half-ass it the rest of the season.

I have a couple non-in depth incentives in mind, in addition to the cash prizes.

  1. If the winner of the in-season tournament makes the playoffs, they get to choose their first round opponent. Would create lots of drama and storylines, while also increasing viewership.

If the winner of the in-season tournament doesn’t make the playoffs, they get increased lottery odds. Still a very good incentive for bad or young teams.

  1. The team who wins gets an extra first round pick. Probably a lesser incentive compared to the first one, but still something teams would want.

What incentives would you guys add if the in-season tournament is permanent?

  • FactCheckingThings@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    None.

    Draft stuff undermines the draft being a way for worse teams to get better.

    Seeding stuff undermines the value of the wins each team gets in the regular season.

    The in-season being prize money and a cup is fine.