Democrats are all upset over Mamdani because he’s a Democratic Socialist? Why? I don’t get it. What’s wrong with being a Democratic Socialist. It seems like a good thing to me. I thought Democrats embraced socialism.

  • sudo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is not actually the same as socialism. It’s confusing, I agree. The closest comparison is to “social democratic” parties in Europe

    Democratic Socialism is not Social Democracy. Democratic Socialism advocates for real socialism through the existing democratic institutions, whereas Social Democracy only advocates for softer capitalism. Particularly, DemSoc’s view capitalism as fundamentally incompatible with democracy.

    Now there’s plenty of things wrong with Democratic Socialism, but the main one is you’re playing by the rules written by the capitalists and are assuming the capitalists will follow those rules.

    • the_abecedarian@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      DSA’s national website is ambiguous. It says: " …democratic socialism, a system where ordinary people have a real voice in our workplaces, neighborhoods, and society. " “A real voice in” is not the same as ownership of or control over.

      However, DSA (both national and local ones) has a number of different movements within it. Some are social democratic, some are authoritarian socialist, some are libertarian socialist, and so on. In the context of Mamdani and Sanders, Democratic Socialism’s social democratic wing is probably the movement having the biggest impact so far. I do hope the libertarian socialst/anarchist movements within DSA ultimately come to influence it the most!

      • sudo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        The DSA was founded by Marxists and has always been socialist. If you show up at a meeting and say ‘I don’t think we need to overthrow capitalism’ you will be laughed out of the room. I’ve seen it happen.

        The libertarian wing of the DSA doesn’t caucus within DSA because they got completely shut down in either the 2017 or 2019 confrenece. Everyone else actually learned something from the failures of Occupy.

        What goes forthe Social Democrat wing of DSA is the faction most connected to Labor unions in the DSA, namely Bread and Roses. The rest are either Trotskyite or ML. There are plenty of anarchists still but they don’t bother with any national caucus. Besides, its not like anarchists aren’t also reading from spooky “authoritarians” like Lenin and Mao. If you want to overthrow capitalism you should read up on the people who’ve actually done it.

        • the_abecedarian@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Besides, its not like anarchists aren’t also reading from spooky “authoritarians” like Lenin and Mao.

          …what? They may read them, but not sympathetically.

          If you want to overthrow capitalism you should read up on the people who’ve actually done it.

          Yeah, like the anarchists in Catalonia, the EZLN in Mexico, AANES/Rojava, and the original workers councils in Russia.

          • sudo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            First everyone should be reading these works critically and not as absolute doctrine. Any ML who’s actually knows what “scientific socialism” means and isnt a tankie larper should know that.

            Second, all except for the Catalonia examples are false.

            • EZLN is literally a Maoist people’s army started by a Maoist cadre. The people they organized simply didn’t see overthrowing the entire Mexican government as worth it. If you knew anything about Mao you would’ve known that.
            • Lenin and Mao were required readings for for the YPG according to western volunteers. Just look into Occalan their connection with the PKK and understand they were just softening their image to get US support.
            • “original workers councils in Russia” AKA the Soviets. Yeah they didn’t read Mao or State and Revolution because they hadn’t been written yet! But to suggest they weren’t reading early Lenin is obvious baloney given that him and the Bolsheviks were their contemporaries.
            • the_abecedarian@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              EZLN did start out as a more authoritarian-influenced group (in the 80s, that was where USSR influence and support was going!) but they have since evolved away from that in major ways, especially after learning from/integrating with indigenous peoples after some initial contact with Mexican national forces. I am not as up on PKK/AANES history, but Ocalan’s major works are primarily influenced by Murray Bookchin, who was extremely anti-authoritarian.

              The soviets eventually came to be dominated by the Bolsheviks, who were majorly influenced by Lenin, but they were formed and initially populated by several factions. It’s reductive to the point of absurdity to give Lenin the whole credit for the overthrow of capitalism in Russia (which was messy and complex), despite his outsized influence on the country from then on. Capitalism had only begun in Russia when serfdom was abolished in 1861 anyway, so the society that was overthrown was really one that failed during the transition.

              Look, debate on these points in this thread is silly and I kinda regret being baited here. We need an easy intro to what socialism even is at this moment, for people like the OP, and we can talk strategy in another place. I’m glad we’re broadly on the same team! Let’s show others questioning society in this moment what we can offer.