Source: https://openai.com/blog/openai-announces-leadership-transition
Today, it was announced that Sam Altman will no longer be CEO or affiliated with OpenAI due to a lack of “candidness” with the board. This is extremely unexpected as Sam Altman is arguably the most recognizable face of state of the art AI (of course, wouldn’t be possible without great team at OpenAI). Lots of speculation is in the air, but there clearly must have been some good reason to make such a drastic decision.
This may or may not materially affect ML research, but it is plausible that the lack of “candidness” is related to copyright data, or usage of data sources that could land OpenAI in hot water with regulatory scrutiny. Recent lawsuits (https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/writers-suing-openai-fire-back-companys-copyright-defense-2023-09-28/) have raised questions about both the morality and legality of how OpenAI and other research groups train LLMs.
Of course we may never know the true reasons behind this action, but what does this mean for the future of AI?
Normally the board would fire the CEO for dishonesty with just “lost confidence”. It would not cause reputational damage, and it would not be legally consequential.
Board must think it’s legally important to fire CEO with language that might indicate that Altman has violated his fiduciary duty and they were not aware. Potentially serious reputational or financial damage that Altman should take with him.
Until proven otherwise I will assume OpenAI was stolen from Sam because it became too valuable too fast.
Didn’t Sam say he’ll be safe at Big Sur if everything goes to hell due to AI? Perhaps that wasn’t exactly what the board wanted to hear.
https://www.axios.com/2023/11/18/openai-memo-altman-firing-malfeasance-communications-breakdown