The shift to sustainable aviation fuel is still minuscule, while growth in passenger air travel is drowning out any climate gains so far. For example, despite IAG’s world-leading status, cleaner fuel accounted for only about 1.9% of its overall fuel consumption last year, and its emissions from fuel combustion still rose by 5%.
Archived copies of the article:
- archive.today - still loading when I posted
- web.archive.org
- ghostarchive.org - missing photos
So, without the shift in fuel the emissions would be 2% higher? Why is that not a good thing?
Yes, we want total emissions lower, but without the efuel emissions would have been even higher.
But the International Air Transport Assn. expects air travel to climb 6%
is that right
Compare money spent on roads, airplanes, and trains per-passenger and you might find the answer there. Outside of China.
6% doesnt feel far enough off the ground…
i was expecting a downturn tbh
6% increase in people flying seems very economically optimistic to me