Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agoAI is modeling David Attenborough and the filmmaker isn’t happywww.androidpolice.comexternal-linkmessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1112arrow-down10
arrow-up1112arrow-down1external-linkAI is modeling David Attenborough and the filmmaker isn’t happywww.androidpolice.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squareJohnEdwa@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoIf it’s something for profit by some massive multi billion dollar company, definitely. That’s just pure greed. But some tiny indie game dev or YouTuber using ai voiceovers is quite a bit more acceptable imo.
minus-squaresculd@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoAgreed. Butterbee’s explanation in this thread is much better than my word.
minus-squareRandoCalrandian@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIs there a specific dollar amount where a creator isn’t allowed to create the way they want anymore?
If it’s something for profit by some massive multi billion dollar company, definitely. That’s just pure greed. But some tiny indie game dev or YouTuber using ai voiceovers is quite a bit more acceptable imo.
Agreed. Butterbee’s explanation in this thread is much better than my word.
Is there a specific dollar amount where a creator isn’t allowed to create the way they want anymore?