OpenAI’s approach to Q-Learning has been drawing significant attention recently.
However, there’s a fundamental issue in the way Q-learning is typically implemented in deep learning and neural network environments. This concern is highlighted in the award-winning paper “Non-delusional Q-learning,” presented at NeurIPS.
The paper suggests a fundamental flaw in the blind application of Q-learning updates to deep neural networks. It points out that such updates can create a self-contradictory scenario where improving the network for the current batch of data inadvertently makes it less effective for other batches. This is akin to a situation in supervised learning where optimizing a network for a specific set of data may degrade its performance on other datasets.
For more insights, the full paper can be accessed here: Non-delusional Q-learning Paper(Follow up ICML paper: Practical Non-delusional-Q Learning )
I’m curious about others’ views on this topic. What do you think about the implications of these findings for the future of Q-learning in deep learning environments?
Yeah, so largely I think you’ve hit the nail but just in case you don’t know the fervour is a deliberately leaked project name “Q*” and the suggestion it precipitated the OpenAI board drama. Now, is this probably a tactic to keep prices high so stock sells @ the 65B valuation OAI had prior to the drama? Sure.
But it’s still fun to speculate.