I am what is known as an early adopter, I try all the new shit, I was on Twitter early and got banned for being a Nazi or something when if you said anything anyone disagreed with you were a fascist.
Chat GPT is something that I have been playing with, 3.5 is as dumb as a plank, If OpenAI wanted to convince me that upgrading to 4 was a good idea they would have made 3.5 interesting enough that it was useful for more than creating outlines.
Here are my concerns.
Chat GPT cannot count, it cannot follow instructions and rehashes the same content in numerous areas, I tried writing blogs about photography, web development, carpentry and more. As a brainstorming device it’s good, to get an outline it’s accep[table, but as far as trusting it with creating original content that needs as much effort to edit and fact check as it would take me to do it from scratch anyway.
In the ever changing, fast paced world yadda yadda is one of it’s gotos. I wonder how many people are posting exactly the same AI generated shite, because they can’t be arsed to actually check it.
IT’s a boon for the spam content creator, but for the person serious about his business< I am not convinced, Convince me.
Your analysis is correct.
I typically use it the other way around. I start with an original idea and an outline and hand it off to AI to make it fit the format required by the audience.
For example, you can write an original and new post about a generic problem, like “How to deal with cheater?”, then ask ChatGPT to mold it for the photographers, web developers, carpenters, and middle aged husbands.
In the end Chat GPT is just a tool. It’s usefulness is proportional to the creativity of the user.
Now that is the best idea I have seen, I will test your methodology