• Pleasant_Heat_1259@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The paragraph you wrote is genuine brain damage.

        Nobody cares about what you think you know what YouTube lawyers. There’s no criminal case going on. There’s no courtroom. Chris Paul’s conduct does not matter. If there is a problem with matchfixing by referees, it doesn’t matter if CP3 Draymond-stomped Scott Fosters sons chest.

        And then your “logic” of why CP3 wouldn’t have creditability for imaginary court is because he’s made dirty plays. I actually can’t even wrap my mind around the points you’re trying to make

          • Pleasant_Heat_1259@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A lesson I learned from lawyers

            make a case against corruption

            your client

            in front of a jury

            Are you seriously okay???

            If anything comes out of this, it prompts an internal investigation where they look at Scott Fosters objectivity as a referee. Stil have 0 idea how CP3 making dirty plays in the best relates.