Accomplished_Milk514@alien.topB to Machine Learning@academy.gardenEnglish · 10 months ago[D] Naive bayesmessage-squaremessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1message-square[D] Naive bayesAccomplished_Milk514@alien.topB to Machine Learning@academy.gardenEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-text
hi everyone, I could not understand answer. I found 1/4 from table. answer is 1/2. thanks everyone. https://preview.redd.it/tht330mp7h2c1.png?width=939&format=png&auto=webp&s=2084932c8e79929563ddc757f012fce0c040453c
minus-squaremofoss@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoFeatures are independent when conditioned on the dependent is pretty much what I know about Naive Bayes, I personally don’t care for the semantics. Also the last time I was using naive bayes was grad school 7 years ago so things are fuzzy, sorry
minus-squareTerrible_Button_1763@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoSave it for your next submission, friend.
Features are independent when conditioned on the dependent is pretty much what I know about Naive Bayes, I personally don’t care for the semantics.
Also the last time I was using naive bayes was grad school 7 years ago so things are fuzzy, sorry
Save it for your next submission, friend.