As per title, Help me choose a browser for android I have non rooted device. After all the researches I found best for me would be 1: Mull but with Some way for knowing which site have saved any data on my device (Maybe by extension or some defined page like about:config type) But as per my research I do not found any such thing. 2:Cromite or like it but with extension support like kiwi. 3:Privacy browser but just give assurance that google will not track me (as I have nonrooted device I have default webview).

I dont think that Vivaldi,Opera or brave stand anywhere when it is about privacy.

Help/advice/correct me!

  • viking@infosec.pub
    163·
    1 year ago

    Fennec (Firefox based), with Ghostery and uBlock origin installed.

    You’ll have to set add-ons up as a private collection for them to work, but it’s easy as pie.

        • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
          11·
          1 year ago

          Just setup links to open in private browsing mode, and clear cookies on browser exit.

            • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
              11·
              1 year ago

              Nope, you should set up site exception. Site exceptions are much better than just leaving cookies persistent. Cookies both function as a method to track and an easy way for a hacker to steal session tokens. Always prefer the native method, reducing attack surface and providing better function with browser APIs. Read the resource wiki linked from Arkenfox user.js

      • viking@infosec.pub
        2·
        1 year ago

        Interesting, I’ll look deeper into that. They have an adblocking engine as well though and catch a few random ones uBlock doesn’t, so I’m not totally convinced they are fully redundant.

          • viking@infosec.pub
            2·
            1 year ago

            Yes, and I do, and yet there are still some escapees. Might be a fringe case as I live in Asia, but at least for me it serves a purpose.

            • Nyfure@kbin.social
              2·
              1 year ago

              Find the escapees, put them on the list or find a list including them for your particular use-case.
              I dont have much things getting through, mostly small sites displaying things, so i just add a filter myself.

              Afaik Ghostery was bought and started tracking its users… or was that another popular extension? Happened to alot of these… pretty sure it was Ghostery?

    • GrappleHat@lemmy.mlEnglish
      7·
      1 year ago

      • Mull is similar to Fennec except with some privacy tweaks. Generally Mull is better.

      • You don’t need Ghostery anymore

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      7·
      1 year ago

      Ghostery sends like every website you visit to their servers. Its opt-out and Ublock origin is better anyways. Firefox really has a problem of not marking bad addons

    • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
      21·
      1 year ago

      Mull works the same as Fennec, except it is hardended with patches from Tor and Arkenfox user.js. No real reason IMO to use fennec over Mull, whose developers also contribute to Fennec. Ghostery also changes your fingerprint, acting as one more data point. Mull has a whole bunch of configured flags to reduce fingerprinting, and many more to help with security (like disabling JIT).

      Check here for some comparisons:

      https://divestos.org/pages/browsers

      https://privacytests.org

      • viking@infosec.pub
        2·
        1 year ago

        Following the pro-Mull comments here I’ve given it a try for a solid 48h, and just reverted back to Fennec. Mull is simply restricting the user experience too much, and I’m not willing to make the sacrifice.

        My biggest annoyances:

        1. Websites don’t get information about dark mode from my device and revert back to light mode by default.
        2. Websites don’t get information about the system time on my phone and deliver content based on GMT+0.
        3. Some websites get wrong (or none?) information about the screen resolution and are unusable.

        I’m aware that those details are suppressed to avoid fingerprinting, and while I believe that the intention is good, it makes using my phone more cumbersome, and that’s not something I’m willing to do. So my choices at this point are basically to keep using Mull and deactivate the advanced fingerprinting protection, or use Fennec as before.

        • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
          21·
          1 year ago

          Firefox resistant fingerprinting does the first 2 things, the last one is mobile partial letterboxing. All are anti fingerprinting techniques, but i understand how they may be restrictive. Maybe just add dark reader to have dark mode forced on websites, which technically can be fingerprinted but has a large userbase so idk.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        1·
        1 year ago

        You can delete cookies and data on a per-site basis, and advanced tracking protection prevents any nefarious websites from exploiting your browser. That’s all I care for.

          • viking@infosec.pub
            1·
            1 year ago

            No, I’m talking about Firefox. Fennec, that is, but the key functions are all the same.

            It’s not in the settings however, you need to open the site in question and press the lock icon in the address bar next to the URL, the context menu there allows to delete cookies and site specific data.

  • Norgur@kbin.social
    11·
    1 year ago

    I think you might try to bite off more than you can chew here. You keep insisting that you want to somehow see the data that’s saved on your device. Why exactly do you want to inspect the local cache of those sites? What do you expect the benefit to be? And what’s more: what do you expect such a local cache to look like?

    • Ambuj Yadav@programming.devOP
      31·
      1 year ago

      I just want to know which site I am logged in and to remove those data in order to logout

      Like on desktop I remove all data from settings of firefox from sites I am not using. Hope I a clear to you

      Btw I want to have clear look that data just as on desktop but as addons will provide that data I think It is going to look bad But thats okay

      • Norgur@kbin.social
        2·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, okay. So: Clearing Browser cache is a common feature in any webbrowser (even Chrome, and if Chrome has it, everyone has)

        Regarding insights into the local cache: Are you technically versed enough to understand what you are seeing? If not, what good would looking at the cache do to you? I mean, whatever is in that cache is no indication about your privacy at all. As @minitycactus found out, Wikipedia logs your last visit. Do they spy on you? Very probably not. Besides, whatever they put into local cache is not something they have on their servers,

        I wouldn’t put too much energy into a search for that specific feature.

  • Daxtron2@startrek.website
    10·
    1 year ago

    I use Firefox focus for random browsing, normal Firefox for general browsing that I want to keep the history of, and Mull for anything where I want to absolutely minimize tracking / enhance privacy.

      • Daxtron2@startrek.website
        2·
        1 year ago

        Not usually, I don’t find it necessary most of the time. I have a separate pw manager (bitwarden) and if I need to share tabs I just message myself

          • Daxtron2@startrek.website
            1·
            1 year ago

            I personally like to keep them separate as I use the different devices for different purposes. I don’t really ever have more than the visible row of bookmarks at any one time. If I need to save something I’m not using often, I’ll archive the page. Like for recipes in particular I have a directory filled with them.

  • tarneo@lemmy.ml
    4·
    1 year ago

    I use Iceraven with ublock, privacy badger, decentraleyes and canvasblocker.

  • Fake4000@lemmy.worldEnglish
    31·
    1 year ago

    I would say go with either chromite or firefox. Both are private, supported for now, and can block ads (UBO on firefox)

  • soyboy77@lemmy.ml
    1·
    11 months ago

    Really liking Vivaldi so far. The baked in adblocking and encrypted syncing is neat. Everybody also always recommends Brave as “good out of the box” where you can use it straight away without any tinkering…

    • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
      31·
      1 year ago

      Because Mull is hardened Firefox without telemetry. Brave is Chromium based and the company is shady.

    • Ambuj Yadav@programming.devOP
      15·
      1 year ago

      U did not readed it well. As firefox on android do not have sandboxing and segregation things It cant give individual websites permissions like js cookie etc. Firefox due to same reason cannot tell about WHICH SITE IS SAVING WHAT DATA ON MY DEVICE.I need to know that info so I am asking for any solution but as per what I know there are no solutions

      Sorry for poor english

      • WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works
        3·
        1 year ago

        cant give individual websites permissions like js cookie etc.

        Don’t you think there is a reason why none of browsers provide this feature? Do you seriously want to open a website and be greeted with 30 pop ups asking “do you want to allow javascript on api.example.com website?”. Then instantly “do you want to allow loading static images/media on api.example.com website?”. Point is - it’s not how web works.

        WHICH SITE IS SAVING WHAT DATA ON MY DEVICE

        Imagine in your perfect world you get a pop up saying “Firefox has detected that example.com has saved 2 cookies on your device and they consume 43 bytes of your storage space. Do you want to delete them?”. Again, even if it saves cached data (static images) - why would you care? Firefox has addons that can help you to get rid of tracking cookies.

        Please learn on how internet works. There is no such thing as “website”, especially in your context. Technically, your requested features could be possible to implement, but that would break like 100℅ of websites. And what you are probably looking for is something like Postman, but for Android. 🙆

        • Pantherina@feddit.de
          1·
          1 year ago

          Noscript does exactly that. Poorly there is no exception to allow x origin only on y domain. But yeah, its supported very well

        • Ambuj Yadav@programming.devOP
          1·
          1 year ago

          Don’t you think there is a reason why none of browsers provide this feature? Cromite does provide it I am writing this reply from it and only some website have js enabled like lemmy instance I use,masto etc. Rest open without it and if something breaks I change settings for it. But I dont hate js, its fine and I was just explaining how I want things to happen. *Firefox has detected that example.com has saved 2 cookies … * I was not saying that but as in chromium or in ff desktop u can check which site have saved what data in settings I just want something like that (Nobody wants that much interupping popups) that would break like 100℅ of websites. Chrome does it and everything works

        • Jajcus@kbin.social
          1·
          1 year ago

          But all this is available in desktop Firefox. Partially built-in, partially via add-ons. The mobile version is very limited.

        • Ambuj Yadav@programming.devOP
          11·
          1 year ago

          I tried some addons and probably cookie is not only form of data. As I was loggined on piped.video but there were no cookie showing in quick cookie manager I also used cookie auto delete and piped data was not deleted. I dont have technical details but in an addon (Name was probably something like forget forever) which claim to delete all site data. There were about 10 types of data listed including cookie,IndexDb,Session storage etc. That extension was also not able to remove that data (Was showing not available on your platform).

          • Pantherina@feddit.de
            1·
            1 year ago

            Use noscript and ublock to control what gets to your browser and what gets executed there. Noscript is so underrated, its literally the best way to remove tracking. All these superficial blockers cant reach manual opt-in for javascript, selected by origin.

            Forgetmenot replaces firefox desktop functionality, but does even more.

            • Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              0·
              1 year ago

              Also, just because a VPN is paid for does not mean it is secure. Look into Mullvad and as a second option Proton VPN, if you have not already.

              • Night Monkey@sh.itjust.works
                02·
                1 year ago

                I have proton plus. What’s wrong with incognito mode and unlock origin??? I’ve been doing this for years. I’ve had no issues

            • Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              0·
              1 year ago

              Well to cut it short, Incognito mode often just means that your own device will not remember anything. Meaning your keyboard does not log your keystrokes, your browser does not save your searches etc. Even if this was compeletely true 100% of the time (which it is not, example, you copy or download something), then the websites you visit would still have your device’s fingerprint, so a VPN connection won’t do much. It is better to use a privacy-oriented browser like Mull. If you want to, you can add incognito mode ON TOP, which on Firefox and therefore Mull is called private browsing mode. Do keep in mind, that it is hard enough to have a non-unique fingerprint. This only gets amplified on mobile devices, at least speaking for Android. IOS is out of the window by default lmao.

              • Night Monkey@sh.itjust.works
                02·
                1 year ago

                😂 you’re telling me that by using proton plus VPN with, say, Firefox in private mode, websites still know who I am? I’m not logged into anything. They don’t know anything.