Hello.
I am seeing the GAN specialization course on Coursera by instructor Sharon Zhou.
In one of the lectures, she says that a disadvantage of GANs is that it cannot do density estimation and thus is not useful for anomaly detection. (not sure if you can access it).
In the next video, she says that VAEs don’t have this problem.
I am a little confused about this. Could anyone please explain what she means?
As far as I can understand from the lecture, density estimation means learning how probable/frequent particular features are in a dataset. Like, how probable is it that a dog will have droopy ears. Then, we can use this info to detect anomalies if they do not exhibit these features.
But, isn’t this exactly what GANs learn? aren’t GANs learning to mimic the distribution of the training data?
Also, how is a VAE different in this particular regard?
Could someone please help explain this?
Thank you.
In theory, can I use the discriminator of the GAN for this?
It will look at a weird picture and say: this looks fake?
Generally, no. What a Discriminator learns seems to be weirder than that. It seems to be closer to ‘is this datapoint in the dataset’ (the original dataset, not the distribution). You can look at the ranking of a Discriminator over a dataset and this can be useful for finding datapoints to look at more closely, but it’s weird: https://gwern.net/face#discriminator-ranking