Yeah the guy you’re arguing with isn’t great. They should have more consideration for others ideas even if they are flawed.
That being said there are serious holes in your thinking. Mainly that capitalism doesn’t actually align with human values. Humans are not purely self-interested and rational like some economic models are based upon. Human greed is part of what makes the rich behave so badly. You’re arguing that socialism doesn’t fit as well with human nature when in reality capitalism doesn’t fit at all either. Systems that rely on infinite growth don’t even fit with the laws of physical reality.
The true answer is to build a system that aligns with both physical reality and human nature, such a system would likely be socialist in nature, though maybe not. It is hard to say. Either way it should be an engineering problem, not something to get tribal over. You could also try to change humans to fit a given system, but this hasn’t worked in the past. US and China try this all the time, bend people to fit their systems and it just doesn’t work.
Finally, a someone with somewhat actually thought through opinion, not any ideological maximalist.
My main take is that capitalism is a shitty, yet reliable system that actually works through ages. I think that pure socialism is still too revolutionary.
What you said in your second paragraph is actually how I think about it. An engineering task. And in general, your opinion is something I can agree with.
P.S. I think, when social networks like lemmy will take over the corporative ones, we could discuss about socialistic revolution. All this fediverse thing kinda shows to people that you can be both non-profit and successful at the same time. Until then, we have what we have.
Yeah the guy you’re arguing with isn’t great. They should have more consideration for others ideas even if they are flawed.
That being said there are serious holes in your thinking. Mainly that capitalism doesn’t actually align with human values. Humans are not purely self-interested and rational like some economic models are based upon. Human greed is part of what makes the rich behave so badly. You’re arguing that socialism doesn’t fit as well with human nature when in reality capitalism doesn’t fit at all either. Systems that rely on infinite growth don’t even fit with the laws of physical reality.
The true answer is to build a system that aligns with both physical reality and human nature, such a system would likely be socialist in nature, though maybe not. It is hard to say. Either way it should be an engineering problem, not something to get tribal over. You could also try to change humans to fit a given system, but this hasn’t worked in the past. US and China try this all the time, bend people to fit their systems and it just doesn’t work.
Finally, a someone with somewhat actually thought through opinion, not any ideological maximalist.
My main take is that capitalism is a shitty, yet reliable system that actually works through ages. I think that pure socialism is still too revolutionary.
What you said in your second paragraph is actually how I think about it. An engineering task. And in general, your opinion is something I can agree with.
P.S. I think, when social networks like lemmy will take over the corporative ones, we could discuss about socialistic revolution. All this fediverse thing kinda shows to people that you can be both non-profit and successful at the same time. Until then, we have what we have.