James Somerton was making $170,000 a year with nearly 6 million views and 267,000 subscribers on YouTube, until…
I mean the video didn’t just “accuse” him, it showed actual evidence and a metric fuckton of it.
Legal terminology
hbomb also included a playlist of smaller queer creators that i’ve really enjoyed!
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLRGz5EMig3r2ZDgeGzwUlSz-PzF-L1Xu1
I mean.
Y u so mean?
I meme
I see
There was another aspect to this video, which was that when Somerset actually did try to write some of the material himself, it was complete garbage.
For example, he completely plagiarized from a book about Disney, but then, he had to transition between one plagiarized book and a different plagiarized article, and in that transition, he presented some facts about Disney organizing gay events at their park, and it was all outright lies. Disney did not actually have any official LGBTQ events at their parks until far after that.
There was a different YouTube video that came out the next day, from this musician who listed all of the outright lies that he discovered while watching Somerset’s channel.
I think the plagiarism displayed by Somerset is atrocious, but personally, I find lying and spreading misinformation to be even worse.
Not to mention the rampant misogyny.
The queer community deserves better. Hopefully this will leave some room for other voices
The queer community clearly already has better, as James plagiarized lots of very talented creators and writers.
This is a great point! I like you’re way of looking at things.
hbomb included a playlist of smaller queer creators that i’ve really enjoyed!
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLRGz5EMig3r2ZDgeGzwUlSz-PzF-L1Xu1
Ahhhh nice, I haven’t finished hbomberguy video yet
I think the Todd in the Shadows video was the nail in the coffin. He might’ve been able to slither back by saying he didn’t realize he was attributing incorrectly (like Internet Historian fans are screaming), but he can’t come back from outright lying the times he wasn’t plagiarizing.
Do you have a link to that different video? I only saw the hbomberguy one I think
I have no issue with the content provided, but I wanted to give a little constructive criticism on the structure of your writing. Real small. When you say,
There was another aspect to this video, which was that when Somerset actually…
When you say there is a thing, the reader is going to assume the next thing you write to be that thing. So you don’t need the “which is that.” You can just launch right into what you’re going to say, you already set it up. You basically said “I have a thing to say. The thing I have to say is this:”
Everything else is informative and well presented. No other notes.
No other notes.
There is another aspect to your comment, which was that it made me laugh really hard.:)
No other notes.
Would you need a semicolon then or not?
There was another aspect of the video; Somerset actually made up…
I don’t know that you need a semicolon but you could definitely use one, and that would probably be the best way. Semicolons are for when two complete sentences are related. But they can still be formatted as two sentences, or even the same sentence with a comma. Many sentences contain parts that could be standalone sentences. But reading back over the original sentence again I would probably say it can just be rewritten to be more straightforward.
“Another aspect to this video is that Somerset, when actually trying to write some of the material himself, produced complete garbage.”
Mostly I’ve just been reading a lot of philosophy recently which tends to run on a long and complex sentence structure that’s unnecessary and could be a lot simpler, so this kind of thing has been at the front of my mind lately. That’s probably the only reason I even noticed in the first place.
Eh doesn’t really flow compared to the original. I would have to reread to understand.
I’m all for omitting unnecessary words, but certain cliché connectors are so ubiquitous that they act as punctuation. You don’t notice them, but reading is less comfortable when they’re missing.
Profiting from the cause, nice.
Be careful. Even if the cause is just, there is never going to be a shortage of shitbags willing to exploit it for their own gain.
Is him being gay even relevant to what happened, or are they just trying to make this about something it’s not?
It’s core to Hbomberguy’s video, really. The guy tried to make himself the gay YouTuber by ripping off other queer content producers, and as a persecuted community that’s had to deal with a forever of social erasure, that’s a whole lot extra shitty.
His channel was about LGBT issues, so it’s actually relevant. It’s a reasonable concern and the source material is a four hour long breadtube thing bordering on self-parody, so I don’t mind responding to this one.
Maybe try reading the article.
…people do that?
Not unless they’re over the age of 30
It’s posted on lgbtqnation. I’m pretty sure that for their audience it’s incredibly fucking relevant.
Read the damn article 😐
Why? There are plenty of comments explaining it
It’s more than relevant. It’s pivotal to the whole ordeal.
Ita an article from a website called lgbtqnation so its not that surprising. Also the guy stole a lot from queer people and was a misogynist.
Yes, very relevant.
I guess him being gay isn’t exactly important. The important thing is that the content that he stole was mostly about LGBTQ media studies. So “gayness” is relevant, but strictly speaking his gayness is not.
Edit: I would also note that if the headline writer was just adding “gay” to be incendiary, the writer could have said “Gay youtuber taken down by bi youtuber” but that would needlessly putting in the “bi” label. The “gay youtuber” is “writing” about gay stuff.
I highly doubt someone writing for LGBTQ Nation is adding “gay” to the headline to be incendiary.
It isn’t. Plagiarism is plagiarism. It’s maybe relevant that that’s what his content was about, but the plagiarism accusation has nothing to do with them being gay
Yeah but it has to do with the fact that he makes and plagiarizes LGBztQ content, specifically
I know that, but the commenter asked a different question. Being gay was not relevant to them getting caught plagiarizing content.
It’s relevant to why a publication called “LGBTQ Nation” would want to cover this story.
It’s fairly important because of the type of content that he is plagiarizing. Personal details can often relate and be important to the type of content that people make (or steal).
Somerton, not Somerset.
Lgbtqnation really needs a new proofreader. I hear James Somerset is looking for… no, I mean… fuck
Still not comfortable about him sleeping on those piles of money.
Nope. He was making six figures a year off other people’s hard work.
Just like most wealthy people, his wealth was stolen not earned.
Good riddance
Why does the article start with “Bisexual British YouTube essayist”? What does his sexuality have to do with anything?
Somerton has a bit of a history of weaponizing his fans to attack anyone bringing up issues by painting them as homophobic and attacking a gay man. Hbomberguy made a point of bringing up his own bisexuality in his video before he even brought up Somerton as a way a kneecapping that before it could start.
Fantastic answer and a good question at that.
It’s actually very important to this discussion. He ripped off a bunch of LGBT+ ppl while promoting himself as one.
Likely to highlight this wasn’t a homophobic incident.
Todd in the shadows took him to the shadow realm.
Came for Todd, stayed for H since I hadn’t heard of him. Dayum that was a hardcore tag team.
Yeah I’m glad he stepped out of music for a moment to slam dunk this.
I wonder if Somerton’s writer has offered any kind of response yet. It was suggested he may have been left in the dark about all of this.
He made a statement, yes. https://www.ntherrgott.com/responseto
Honestly a great response. That question he asks himself, “how did I miss this?” really strikes me as genuine. I can’t imagine working with someone professionally and being let down so hard. You don’t want to have to doubt your colleagues or your friends.
Todd in the Shadows’ video about the many obvious errors and lies in Somerton’s videos includes a bit about the cowriter Nick at 55:49.
Der is d
D
Popular YouTuber deletes online presence after video accused him of rampant plagiarism.
There fixed your head line.
Him being gay is actually very relevant because he was profiting off of queer authors’ works without attribution while proporting to support their cause. His whole shtick was being gay and analyising media through a gay/lgbtq+ lens. The title highlights the hypocrisy.
Also this is an lgbtq+ focused publication so such a classification isn’t unusual.
Not only that, lying AND being misogynist at the same time.
deleted by creator
So are you implying that if he weren’t gay he wouldn’t be plagiarizing?
Here, let’s flip the script. A magazine about crime writes an article with the following title: black man is sentenced to 20 years in prison for murder.
The fact that the man is black is not relevant to the fact that he committed murder. The word black was put in specifically to make it sound more controversial. You know so more people would click on it.
Or for something more benign an automotive publication writes an article entitled: red car crashes into a wall.
The fact that a car is red has nothing to do with it crashing into a wall.
Moreover, the fact that the publication is LGBTQ+ already is enough implication of the possible orientation of the subjects in the article and does not have to be emphasized in the title of the article. If it needs to be brought up it may be in the article proper.
And, on the other side of this you’ll never see an article titled: straight person so and so. Which is a whole other issue in and of itself.
It’s relevant to the article you virtue-signalling dumbass
The relevant conundrum in the title is the fact that this person committed plagiarism not the fact that he’s gay that was added in as pandering clickbait.
Plagiarism doesn’t give a crap about what one’s orientation sex or gender is.
Moreover the engagement in the comment section specifically mentions this on more than one occasion as in I’m not the only one talking about the word gay in the title. So now instead of discussing the intellectual crime this particular person committed we’re now discussing the title in and of itself which takes away from the article.
But I wouldn’t expect a narrow
sitedsighted idiot such as yourself to understand the nuance of all this stuff.However I do commend you on using your word of the day, you even hyphenated it correctly!
I feel like everyone complaining about the title didn’t bother to click on the link to see the source - it makes perfect sense to me that a site called “LGBTQ Nation” would point out in the title why it’s relevant to being published there.
Narrow sited idiot
Please find a new hobby
Look at the URL. Do you really think they need to pander to an audience given the nature of the publication? They would be singing to the choir here, I don’t think they would get much benefit.
Honestly the lack of critical thinking here is truly spectacular
It’s preaching to the choir.
Talk about critical thinking.
He’s not just a youtuber who’s gay. He is a gay youtuber. He is a gay youtuber who’s gay. No one would watch a gay youtuber who’s straight.
Why though? We had Queer Eye, why not Hetero Eye for the Gay Guy? Would be interesting.
That would be cancelled so fast for “gay deletion” or whatever.
Can you even imagine how that show would go?
“You spend how much on clothes? I bought this shirt at Target for $15 and it is just as good.”
“Why the hell you got so much shit on your bathroom counter, looks like a lady lives here.”
“You need to man-up.”
“Purses as pretty fucking gay dude, just wear cargo pants or use a Jansport.”
