• azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          IIRC it was one lower court case in Germany… That’s so many asterisk attached as to be meaningless, even if that judgement isn’t struck down or amended (unlikely), that still only applies to Germany (or was it one state within Germany?).

          The way the EU works is that it mandates each sovereign country to implement the mandate into their national laws, so jurisprudence in Germany doesn’t mean anything at all anywhere else.

        • Gladaed@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          To discern if an add blocker is in use you are processing information not essential to your service.

          You could, eg. Not start the stream until the add is over if it wasn’t blocked without violating this. In the end whether or not the user uses an add blocker is not relevant to your ability to stream a video.

        • ZickZack@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Basically the stuff they need to detect whether ads are actually shown needs information of the device state that are generally not available according to Article 5(3) ePR.

    • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was some low effort attempt talking about “code that I do not like running on my PC” or something like that, words like “malware” were thrown around. Basically if detecting adblocks is illegal so should be any JavaScript code.