• killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    9 months ago

    This reeks of bringing people to the well after it’s already dried up. The established convenience of Apple Pay is unlikely to take much of a hit from would-be competitors.

    I do hope, though, that it spurs Apple to innovate a bit more, particularly w.r.t loyalty and rewards schemes and the likes.

    • _s10e@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I agree, but at least it is now possible to compete with Apple Pay. The position of Apple and Google Pay is too strong if competition is unthinkable.

      Apple was smart to partner with the banks and acting as a proxy initially. The next step could bypass Visa, MasterCard, banks, payment processors, …

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      The established convenience of Apple Pay is unlikely to take much of a hit from would-be competitors.

      Disagree. Apple Pay charges much higher rates than competing payment processors. It benefits everyone except Apple to make the change. It is equally convenient to use a different app w/ NFC.

      • TheMurphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Higher rates? Do customers pay more for using Apple Pay than any other solution where you are from?

        I know shops pay a fee, but never heard it to be on the customer to pay.

        • trolololol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s common in Australia to tell customers that cc card fees are added to the bill. Not everywhere but also not surprise.

          Your country + my country is a small share of global market, unless you’re in China.

        • straypet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Well but guess where the merchants get their money to pay for that expense. If it increases the business’s cost, it ends up being paid by the final consumer.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The higher rates are passed on to the merchant to eat, just like any other payment processors.

          But the merchant is in charge of what payments are accepted.

          To the consumer, it will be no different. Apple will just be cut out as the useless middleman they are.