• appel@whiskers.bim.boats
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Smartphone CEOs dumbfounded when no one wants to buy their $1999 xPhone 25 Pro Max XXL Z-Flip 4d-folding hextuple AI 8k camera with Bionic 10Ghz chip including real neurons

  • Achird@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 years ago

    Not surprising. I used to update every 2 years but my last couple have had a 3 or 4 year gap.

    As it should be really. These can be very expensive devices that only make sense if you get a decent life out of them.

    • penguin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      When smartphones first took off, each new one was a large upgrade. But each passing year sees new phones being more and more iterative. There’s hardly any difference at all anymore between individual years.

      I’m at the point now where I keep my phones until they break or stop getting security updates.

      • 6xpipe_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        When smartphones first took off, each new one was a large upgrade

        And they were subsidized by the cell phone company, so they only cost $200 (In many places in the US, at least).

        • Achird@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Yeah definitely this is a big factor.

          I have a small pot I save into for my phone upgrade each month. Waiting longer means I get a shiner new phone when I do finally decide to upgrade.

          And once I have it I want it to last as long as possible!

          When it used to be just part of your contract you wouldn’t think about, just get a new one when your contract said it was time.

          • 6xpipe_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            There wasn’t even a maximum on the contract. When I got my first two phones, I agreed to a 2-year cellular contract. If I closed my account or moved providers before that, I had to pay AT&T some amount of money to kill the contract. After those two years were up, I could do whatever I wanted. I was then on a month-to-month payment, like standard cell plans today. They just wanted to make sure to recoup their money over 2 years for subsidizing my cheaper phone upfront.

            Now, the subsidization is more like a subscription fee, where there are additional fees on the bill each month toward the phone and the cell phone company encourages you to get a new one once it’s paid off. You’re still paying full price for a phone. Possibly forever.

  • FriendlyBeagleDog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I could understand upgrading so frequently at the advent of mainstream smartphones, where two years of progress actually did represent a significant user experience improvement - but the intergenerational improvements for most people’s day-to-day use have been marginal for quite some time now.

    Once you’ve got web browsers and website-equivalent mobile apps performing well, software keyboards which keep up with your typing, high-definition video playback working without dropped frames, graphics processing sufficient to render whatever your game of choice is for the train journey to work, batteries which last a day of moderate to intense use, and screen resolutions so high that you can’t differentiate the pixels even by pressing your eyeball to the glass - that covers most people’s media consumption for the form factor, and there’s not much else to offer after that.

    • OscarRobin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah my semi-techie friend still has an S9+ from over 5 years ago and honestly he isn’t really missing anything beyond a few iterative improvements.

      • dukeGR4@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        S9+ from over 5 years ago

        he’s been missing out on 3 years + of security updates kek

        *cries in Samsung

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      If the batteries were easily replaceable, and the software didn’t continually get bloated, and companies kept issuing security patches, sure.

      I kept my last desktop system for 10 years. Actually I still have it and it performs sort of ok (I was running Mint the whole time). But I upgraded and the performance improvement was actually worth the considerable cost. I’ve gotten similar life out of my other desktops and laptops over the years.

      I think at least 5 years or preferably 10 is reasonable for smart phones.

  • Doherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 years ago

    Not surprising when flagship devices have more than doubled in price in over the last decade.

    That and the fact that many modern devices feel like compromised devices with purposeful downgrades despite the huge cost increase.

    • phi1997@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      I want a cell phone with a headphone jack, physical navigation buttons, and a rectangular screen like they used to make. At this point, I’ll have to go with a flip phone if I want all of those features.

      • scoredseqrica@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m not saying you’re wrong, you can want whatever you want, but out of curiosity, why physical navigation buttons? They’re a point of failure over time, make dust and water ingress more of a problem. While I like physical buttons for some things; power, volume and physical mute switch are all great (I wouldn’t hate a shutter button too) but at least they have the virtue of living round the sides and top of the phone, not the front of the phone like nav buttons, which take up space that could be screen (or just a smaller phone). It’s not like a physical home or back button is actually any more responsive than a gesture based nav. What’s the attraction to them?

        • phi1997@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          With capacitative buttons and on-screen buttons, there are times where I hit them on accident, which is annoying. The little bit of extra force you need for physical buttons makes this much less likely. I also don’t like when on-screen buttons are hidden, and I am worried that I would trigger gestures on accident.

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Regarding flagship models: I found that previous years flagship or current mid-range with similar specs (I use gsmarena to compare) is a good compromise between speed and lifespan, and always go for more memory, today’s android uses about 20gb so 128gb must be absolute minimum if you plan to have a few apps installed.

  • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 years ago

    What do you mean “instead of”? I always heard it was a three year product lifecycle anyway, which is already annoyingly often.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 years ago

      Just get a the battery replaced. With the new rule for the EU forcing companies to make the phones with user replaceable batteries, it’ll be even easier.

      • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        I thought about it last time but the whole thing where I’m not getting OS updates anymore make me anxious. I’m not sure that’s actually a problem though.

        • anguo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s a little more hands on, but when you reach the end of OS updates support, you can switch to a community-supported OS.

            • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 years ago

              Sorta. (Android is technically Linux) What you would want to look into is a custom Android ROM. Something like OmniROM or ArrowOS.

              As a side note though, installing can be a bit technical for some people and some apps don’t like to work outside of the “security” of a factory version of Android. If you are interested, I would browse around the custom Android communities here (if there are any yet) and check out sites like https://www.xda-developers.com/

                • ThePinkUnicorn@lemdro.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Rooting is a slightly separate thing from sideloading a custom rom, rooting gives apps you give permission to access to system files whereas sideloading a rom replaces the system files but doesn’t necessarily give you root access. Both involve a similar process of unlocking the bootloader, installing a custom recovery and flashing a file so it is easy to get the two things mixed up.

            • anguo@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              No, there are unfortunately no truly workable Linux OSs for phones yet AFAIK. But there are plenty of Android-based OSs that work really well, and are usually maintained for quite a while, depending on the popularity of your device. Look into LineageOS, or Pixel Experience, to name a few.

  • aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    i use electronics until they’re unusable. my last phone lasted 6 years, my laptop lasted 11 years. i don’t have a tv or anything else.

      • Thoth19@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        I watch all of my shows from laptop personally (not the person you are replying to). I don’t care super hard about the big screen. And it means I can do other things on my other monitors at the same time.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I like working at the living with the TV precisely because it offloads the work to a different device. So compiling and running heavy scripts doesn’t affect the video playing and the reproduction doesn’t compete for CPU/GPU cycles or internet bandwidth with work tasks. It’s not about the big screen (though I do enjoy big screens) but more about separation of concerns.

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve had my tablet for 9 years, and I’d have had my phone for 4 years now had it not become faulty.

    Devices have reached a point that they just don’t need upgrading often, unless you’re using them for video games or something cutting edge.

    And of course, they’re super expensive now too, and we’re living in the worst cost of living crisis of our generation, struggling to pay for food. Of course we’re not going to waste money replacing something that works fine 🤦‍♀️

  • LazyBane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    I kept my old Sony Xperia right up until I could feel a bulge on the back of it, lol.

  • shinjiikarus@mylem.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    That is going to be a problem for apple, better make the next iPhone’s battery be unreplaceable and self destruct after 2 years.

    • Oisteink@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve been using iPhones since iPhone 4. So far I’ve had the iphone4, iPhone 7+ and iPhone 13max.
      All my phones have been replaced upon end of updates. I think you mix android and iPhone here - I know nobody under 70 that manage to keep an android over 2 years

      • Alto@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        And pretty much everyone in my family has used our android phones for 4+ years for as long as I can remember.

        It’s almost as if anecdotes are worthless!

      • shinjiikarus@mylem.eu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        Oh sorry, this wasn’t an iOS-vs-Android dig, all the android manufacturers are constantly near bankruptcy, but apple has shareholders who are expecting growth, they will be hurt the most by consumers holding their on to their phones longer. (Samsung is reporting over 90% profit shrinkage, the Chinese brands are probably just PLA plants to capture as much communication as possible worldwide without a profit motive to begin with)

      • appel@whiskers.bim.boats
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        My dad is still using my old OnePlus one from 2014. Works fine for him. Using lineage OS. I know it doesn’t get security updates but he’s not stupid and doesn’t use it for anything security critical anyway.

      • MaXsteri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m way under 70, and I’m using an S10e I brought in 2019. So four years.

        Updates stopped coming in March. But I’ve no plans to replace the phone yet. Since this one works fine, and very few phones released since have the features that matter to me.

  • Darkhoof@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Not surprising. For most people smartphone reached a point where replacing every two years is pointless. My phone is also 4 years this year, still holds his battery and works flawlessly.

    • criticon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve been upgrading every two years because usually they have some promo for trade ins (Samsung) so I’m getting a new battery and warranty (and slight improvement of camera) for about $200

    • Aasikki@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Only just replaced my close to 4 years old OnePlus 7 Pro, because it just bricked out of the blue. Would have happily used it for a couple more years. Practically the only improvements on my Pixel 7 Pro, compared to the OnePlus, are battery life and the cameras (especially since I was running Pixel experience on it anyways).

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think it is mainly battery life which drives upgrades now. Unless you really want the best camera. It’s the only thing that seems to improve for the last few iterations.

      • Aasikki@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Everything else is pretty much perfected at this point, but batteries and tiny cameras are hard to perfect. Still have to wait more than two years to see any meaningful improvements in either of those.

  • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well the networks will try to tie people in for 36/48 months so… they kind of asked for it.

  • hubobes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I will buy a new phone when my phone actually dies, broken screens and old batteries can be replaced. And iOS gets updates for like forever.

  • Stinkywinks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve had my moto x4 for 8 years and it’s still kicking strong. If it ever dies, I’m getting another.