DES MOINES, Iowa (KCRG) - On Thursday, the Satanic Temple of Iowa announced that their display at the Iowa Capitol had been significantly damaged.

The controversial display, which Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds called “objectionable,” featured a ram’s head covered with mirrors on a mannequin before being damaged.

Organizers say it’s a symbol of their right to religious freedom.

The Satanic Temple of Iowa posted the following message on their Facebook page:

“This morning, we were informed by authorities that the Baphomet statue in our holiday display was destroyed beyond repair. We are proud to continue our holiday display for the next few days that we have been allotted.

We ask that for safety, visitors travel together and use the 7 Tenets as a reminder for empathy, in the knowledge that justice is being pursued the correct way, through legal means.

KCCI has reported that 35-year-old Michael Cassidy of Lauderdale, Mississippi, was charged with Criminal Mischief in the 4th Degree. He has since been released.

Solve et Coagula! Happy Holidays! Hail Satan!”

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Because it’s the compromise that means the Christians can have their display.

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes. That’s the point.

        The Baphomet display is essentially a protest of those displays being allowed. Christians want their display at the capital, so they allow religious displays. But now a Satanic display is put up next to theirs, which is also allowed by the exact same rules.

        So they either have to put up with it, just like non-Christians have to put up with theirs, disallow all of them, or just go mask-off Christian state and start getting specific about which religions are acceptable in their laws.

        • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s also important to note the group that put the Baphomet there isn’t a theological one, it’s the Athiest Satanists, so to them this is purely about trolling Churches that try to influence the state.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah, the Satanic Temple is a fucking amazing group of people and if there is anything approaching a good religion, its theirs, since they use religion to fight for the people and give, while the evangelicals only use theirs to take.

              • brax@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                11 months ago

                No, they’re really a religion. They are recognized as such by the US government and are tax exempt just like the church.

                • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  and are tax exempt just like the church.

                  Unlike the Church of Satan, which is not tax exempt because they explicitly believe churches should be taxed.

                  • brax@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Also because they aren’t recognized as a religious organization in the USA and this can’t apply for tax exemption.

                    The other part of TST being tax exempt falls in line with them basically doing everything the church does to point out hypocrisy. If TST made the billions that the church does, I’m sure they’d also be doing far more campaigns

      • voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s equality. If the people in charge say, “We’re playing chess”, you can’t just sit in the corner and sulk and say “I want to play checkers!” You’ll be left out of the chess game then.

        So, you go play chess, and you see that one side has all of their pieces, but you only have pawns. You can point that out and show how the system is being rigged against you. It’s obvious to outsiders how it’s unfair and needs to change.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The whole point. To avoid violating 1A, they can’t discriminate regarding religion, so if they permit religious displays they have to permit them for any religion that wants one, and grant them equal treatment.

        So if some Jews and a Wiccan group wanted to join in and have a Chanukah display and a Yule display those would have to be permitted as well. Given choice I’d rather instead of TST showing up ot piss off Christians that every minority religious group in the state demand a display because that would make it easier to kill the whole program when instead of two displays it becomes an unreasonable number to deal with.