10 years after Zod’s snapped neck, Martha, “some kinda Suicide Squad”, CGI moustache, rennouncing your wish, the hiearchy of power changing, and Speed Force PS1 graphics, the DC Extended Universe finally comes to a close. And it ends the same way it started - with a Rotten score.

Looking back at all this wasted potential, what would you have done differently with the DCEU, and what are your hopes for James Gunn’s DC Universe?

  • Echo5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Iirc isn’t rotten tomatoes where you want to wait for the audience score because the critics are often out of tune with the audience? Not that I’m disinclined to believe the movie’s bad though, like you said DCEU has been pretty abysmal.

  • Can_you_change_your_username@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The movies don’t all have to be connected by a single overreaching narrative, give us some standalones. Give us a feel good Justice Society movie and a utopian sci-fi Legion of Superheroes. It would also be nice to move away from the core Justice League team and world or universe level threats. Let Nightwing stop the Zodiac Master’s plan to rob a series of banks.

    • Fat Tony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You moron, they tried that with ‘The Batman’ and look how that turned out! /s

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Trying to make DC a gritty Marvel is what fucked it up for them.

      The core Justice League members are endlessly optimistic and idealistic, even Batman, and that is what makes them work.

      Having Superman let a tornado kill his dad is what makes it fail.

  • This is the case for when franchises get milked forever. They CAN’T die on a good note. Good notes is what promotes sequels. Only when they get a low note they start discontinueing.

    It’s why most franchise stories seem to end on dissatisfactory cliffhangers

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Sometimes it’s not even “forever”. Wonder Woman '84 was only the 2nd film and it shit the bed so hard it not only killed any future WW movie, but it tanked the Star Wars movie the director was supposed to do next.

      • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean, the first Wonder Woman movie was garbage too so…

        But hey the Zack Snyder cut of justice league was pretty dope

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          First 2/3rds of Wonder Woman was fine, but it fell apart at the end. WW 84 though, eesh. Bell to bell just trash, except Pedro Pascal who is a joy!

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hopes? None. Warner Bros. has no fucking clue how to use DC characters and ideas in theaters. They may get lucky with specific movies being decent, but the best movies are not even as good as the worst of the animated movies and series. They keep throwing money and names at live action, instead of focusing on telling good stories that stay true to the essence of the characters.

    I don’t see Gunn doing any better tbh. For one, he’s going to be hamstrung by whatever Warner decides is the goal. For another, he’s going to end up limited by whatever flawed view executives have of the servers characters. And then he still may not have a grasp of what either comics fans or non comic fans need from a movie featuring DC characters.

    • Hereforpron2@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think that another risk you run by putting Gunn in this role after he found the only success in modern DC movies and series is pressure to become too Gunn-y. The same way that Marvel was so taken with Taika Waititi’s Ragnarok that they had him go even more Waititi on Love and Thunder, which clearly made it worse, and then tried to incorporate similar humor in other projects that fell flat. Sometimes playing to hard into a unique success just proves that it was either largely novelty-driven or that you just can’t recapture it.