• pl_woah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Humans think real random isn’t random 🙃

      It’s wild but they see patterns

      • pup_atlas@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        9 months ago

        The problem isn’t that their random is biased or has rules, the is that it is entirely deterministic, to the point where it will play the same exact songs, in the same exact order for days. It’s as if shuffle just activates a hidden “shuffle” playlist that only updates once a week.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’d guess that every time user presses “shuffle” they just shuffle the playlist and never change the order afterwards. So song order is really not random it’s shuffled

        • pl_woah@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          You and I might be talking about different things.

          I mean that humans don’t like theoretically true random, as a cool side note

          You seem upset about one implementation

          Also, shuffling and having something appear near even though you throught it was shuffled is part of that finding patterns

          • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yep, I know what you’re talking about, but spotify weights songs it thinks you’ll like higher than other songs, and with big playlists it really is a noticeable problem. There are services that shuffle the order of your playlist, so then in spotify you play it with spotifys shuffle turned off, and yes there are “patterns” that I notice (one song I had in their twice, I think like a single version and album version, was right next to itself), but at least I actually hear songs I haven’t heard in a long time, and I don’t get the same ones regularly

          • pup_atlas@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yes, that was what I was getting at. Not having true random is one thing, I understand (and like) that implementation. Apple has been doing it since the first few iPods. But Spotify “shuffle” isn’t near even, it is exactly even, as in “if you shuffle play this playlist twice two days in a row, it will play the exact same order”. Which is why people are complaining about Spotify specifically.

        • pl_woah@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          CSPRNGs are a thing…

          As are radioactive sources

          And there’s mathematical tests for whether something is random enough

          So no, computers really can do random xD

            • pl_woah@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              A CSPRNG is more than random enough for a playlist xD

              Take it from someone who works in the field - computers do random well enough rotflol

      • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Because my playlist has thousands of songs yet I hear the same ones a lot, their algorithm weights songs it thinks you like to be more common in the shuffle