CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoIt’s time to ban ‘right-on-red’www.fastcompany.comexternal-linkmessage-square218fedilinkarrow-up1292arrow-down1150
arrow-up1142arrow-down1external-linkIt’s time to ban ‘right-on-red’www.fastcompany.comCombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square218fedilink
minus-squarewildginger@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down2·1 year agoInsanely frustrating how 50+% of this thread is people flatly arguing against a situation they just dont understand. Not even a disagreement of opinion, just flatly arguing about a topic that has nothing to do with turning right on a red light intersection.
minus-squareduffman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoWell, people are arguing cases for different countries in the same thread.
minus-squarewildginger@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoMan, I dont even mean different legal situations. So many people in here dont get what “right on red” means in a physical, moving sense.
Insanely frustrating how 50+% of this thread is people flatly arguing against a situation they just dont understand.
Not even a disagreement of opinion, just flatly arguing about a topic that has nothing to do with turning right on a red light intersection.
Well, people are arguing cases for different countries in the same thread.
Man, I dont even mean different legal situations. So many people in here dont get what “right on red” means in a physical, moving sense.