I hear it’s the first browser in a long while to come with a new engine. Completely independent and no revenue model. To me that would work well for privacy but I see no mention of privacy as any benefit. In fact I don’t see a privacy policy anywhere !

Is a goal of the browser to be telemetry free ? Should I as a person who cares about privacy be showing any interest?

  • eleijeep@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The founder of Ladybird (Andreas Kling) has the alt-right brain-worm, and let’s be honest: we know what those people are cheering for right now.

  • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s unremarkable and has baggage.

    The Servo browser is where it’s at. It’s written entirely in rust so it has a leg up on stability and security over other browsers. The issue is that they’re not really interested in the most important part, which is things like bookmarks and dark mode. They are laser focussed on the engine and anyone who would use Servo would be fine with a few websites looking broken.

    If Firefox released a Servo-based spin, I’d use that in a heartbeat.

  • oblivion96@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    tbh I’m more excited about Servo.org. They’re also developing a fully independent browser engine and are funded by the Linux Foundation. Ladybird has corporate sponsors, so I’m a bit hesitant. But the more the merrier I guess.

    • the_weez@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Has something changed recently? Last time I looked at Servo it was just an engine, not a full browser. The servo project wants others to use their rendering engine to create browsers and use it as an alternative to Electron.

      • HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s just the engine, but it’s supposed to be a much more modern and smaller engine, so writing a new browser on top of it would be much easier than using gecko is. But you’re right, it’s not a browser. There is Verso as a prototype browser, but it’s far from functional.

      • oblivion96@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That’s true, but they have a prototype “browser” you can download from their website. And I’m hoping for a fleshed out version in the end, either from them or someone else.

  • ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I am paying attention to both Ladybird and Servo but am not yet “excited” about either. I am hoping they both continue to improve and become more usable (for me - YMMV) but do not expect the possibility of Daily Driver usage (again, for my use model) for at least another year.

  • Lytia @lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    My understanding is that they have no intent to violate user privacy, but they’re also not going out of their way to protect it. The goal is to have a completely independent browser, everything else falls second to that.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    In terms of privacy, not really more than any other FOSS browser.

    What’s more interesting about it is that they’re developing their own browser engine (meaning there will be another independent implementation of web standards) and licensing it (IIRC) more permissively than the existing ones. But that is of course not what this community is about.