A couple were told they faced a $200,000 (£146,500) medical bill when their baby was born prematurely in the US, despite them having travel insurance which covered her pregnancy.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ferris, who was 33 weeks pregnant with their first child, had been given the all clear for the trip and flight by her midwife and GP.

      She was 7 weeks early, that’s easily a good month before she is “recommended not to fly”.

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Huh…I didn’t know you could cut it that close. I figured it was more like “don’t fly during the 3rd trimester.”

        Shows what I know.

        • ecvanalog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think “during the third trimester” is essentially folk wisdom because who wants to push their luck?

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            We’ll also historically people weren’t very good at keeping track of when they got pregnant so it was a bit hit and misses to when the baby would be due.

      • asret@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Most travel insurance policies exclude cover once you’re in your third trimester. The article mentioned that they’d be clarifying this in their policy as well.

        Insurance policy limits are dictated by profits, not doctors’ recommendations.