• IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    This seems interesting and it seems like a big update. Has anyone used this for print media formatting? Can you speak to how well it works, how easy it is to use, and what it’s like to switch if you’re coming from Publisher or InDesign?

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I tried it years ago and it felt more like Quark to me (not a compliment) but should give it another chance. For the past several years I’ve been using Affinity Publisher in a Windows VM.

      Edit: just tried it out a bit (ver. 1.5.8 because that’s what’s in the Arch repo) and it’s better than I remembered. Adobe-like shortcuts. I made a new document and created a few text styles.

    • clb92@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve previously used versions 1.4.* and 1.5.* quite a bit for print, because I’m a one-man marketing department in a tiny company.

      Scribus was (is?) somewhat finicky and cumbersome to work with. It had certain quirks and workarounds you had to learn to deal with. It lacked many creative features you find in bigger suites. I didn’t feel like I worked quickly and efficiently in it. BUT I got my work done in it nevertheless, and I really appreciate that it exists for the people that simply can’t afford the alternatives.

      Nowadays I use the Affinity suite, which includes Affinity Publisher, a competitor to InDesign. It’s quite affordable and not subscription-based.

    • spacecow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mostly use it to make my resume. It works well for that, but feel like it would be annoying to make a large document using it.