• Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes, and all the download sites and tools don’t use anything else either. They all just wrap yt-dlp.

          If it stopped working for you, you might have to read the docs on the specific error you’re getting to see how to get around it. YouTube does try to make it harder, but it’s technologically difficult to fully block. There are workarounds for basically every case as far as I’m aware.

          • sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            I checked it now and it works fine if I don’t use VPN. but regular youtube also work fine without VPN.

            If I switch to VPN both yt-dlp and normal youtube give same error “please login to prove you are not a bot” which is the problem OP is originally trying to find work around for

            • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              I find switching VPN endpoints works, bit whack-a-mole, but works. Actually I run a few with gluetun and just switch proxy port numbers.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do any of these instances ever work ?

      I loved invidious for a long time but I just gave up about 6 months ago.

      Even hosting your own instance it was almost always not working waiting for a new release or workaround to be pushed.

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          29 days ago

          Its not the individual instances but the underlying project.

          Its not even the maintainers fault. Its a cat and mouse game. The devs have done an epic job of keeping up, but ultimately all of these projects are unreliable.

          yt-dlp is the gold standard and provides the back end for many of these projects, but its cli only.

          Ive found freetube desktop app to be more reliable than invidious. Also pipepipe for Android.

      • Semjeza@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        I watched the side boobvideo on invaneko, for science, to ensure no barriers to the video.

        But I agree, they’re at best inconsistent.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    30 days ago

    No, afaik every alternative frontend that still works with age-restricted videos works by letting you sign in with a Google account (which defeats the point). I’ve tried a few.

    I just make an account for just the age-restricted videos. FreeTube still works for me for non-age restricted videos (if it doesn’t for you, try changing VPN countries a few times—also you need to restart FreeTube every time you change VPN servers, otherwise it doesn’t work from the new server, idk why).

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Nothing, just using the latest FreeTube. Are you up to date? They’ve pushed out a few releases recently to get around new YouTube trickery. Your VPN server might also be blocked; I’ve had luck with Mullvad’s Swedish servers lately.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          The precise situation is that US states don’t have age verification laws right now but Texas tried to implement one on Jan 1 (Texas SB2420 - it got blocked by a judge as unconstitutional) and Louisiana and Utah have laws coming into effect soon.

          So it’s both true that platforms are moving because of laws but there are no laws. The laws have been announced for many months. They aren’t trivial to implement so of course platforms are doing advance work. They might even want to test it before the laws come into effect, and see how badly it hurts them while they still have time to adjust and fiddle.

          No company wants to do age verification IMO. There is no upside for them. Maybe if we actually prosecuted tech companies for harming children, there would be, but lolz.

  • enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Seems like internal A/B testing. happened to me few weeks ago in whatever device/front ends. I tried Tor but maybe it is already blocking Tor, still requires sign in. Using VPN finally works in few countries.

    But 3 days later I can use NewPipe as normal.

    Well except I think age-restricted videos are never accessible without login from any frontends

  • Sammirr@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    You can either wait or hop from VPN endpoint to endpoint, though both are workarounds. I’d suggest that we can expect more of this too.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    29 days ago

    It’s automated testing to see if they can force you to login.

    My VPN (mullvad) lets me use socks5 proxies for any exit node, so when I hit this I just change my freetube proxy number and it works. Annoying

    It would be nice to integrate a list of socks5 proxies into freetube and have it auto rotate

    • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      Unfortunately, thats only true for the, “Please sign in to confirm you’re not a bot.” gate. The age gate is a separate system, that blocks on a per-video rather than per-user basis.

    • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Unfortunately, thats only true for the, “Please sign in to confirm you’re not a bot.” gate. The age gate is a separate system, that blocks on a per-video rather than per-user basis.

      • Mantzy81@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Ehhh…yeah but all of that can be faked though…

        You’re lying about your age for a reason kiddo,.you’ve got to do the whole thing or nothing at all.

  • nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    If that video contains some kind of nudity, it is possible to find it on a site like ytboob. Otherwise there is no way to watch it without an account.

        • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Is it regional or something? Videos are still blocked for me:

          Also, funny bug in that the recommended videos are still there, but just not visible, so tapping anywhere opens a new video.

      • hesh@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        PipePipe allows me to watch videos without signing in that ask for “sign in to confirm you’re not a bot” on the normal YouTube interface.

        There may be videos that are age-restricted or otherwise account-locked that it can’t access I think, but I haven’t run into them.

        • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The age restricted videos like what OP asked about are unfortunately pretty common with topics like history, or games - anything that may have any amount of violence. So far as I know, the only way to bypass them is by proxy.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    I understand the sentiment, but gotta say YouTube is one service that is much better when logged in. I have my history and personalization disabled everywhere except YouTube. If I open YouTube’s front page in an incognito tab, it’s wall-to-wall trash on the level of Jerry Springer. Meanwhile I’ve been getting recommendations to my precise taste for years. Lots of good music found in the recs.

    I don’t even open random YouTube links from social media under my account, so as to not mess up the recommendations. Always using an incognito tab instead (which is admittedly foiled by the ‘sign up’ thing when I have to use a vpn).

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      29 days ago

      This was changed some time ago. This is YT front page when you’re logged out:

      Which is exactly what I want to be recommended by YT.

      • [object Object]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Hmmm, you’re right, it now tells me to “search to get started”. Guess the onslaught of total unmitigated crap as the default page for a region was rather embarrassing. That’s the downside of using the greatest common factor as the starting point.

        Thankfully I have my own interests instead, and taught them to Youtube. Works like a charm.