pbpza@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoTIL that operating system Linux is an example of anarcho-communismen.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square254linkfedilinkarrow-up1499arrow-down199cross-posted to: anarchism@lemmy.mlfoss@beehaw.organarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.comtil@lemmy.world
arrow-up1400arrow-down1external-linkTIL that operating system Linux is an example of anarcho-communismen.wikipedia.orgpbpza@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square254linkfedilinkcross-posted to: anarchism@lemmy.mlfoss@beehaw.organarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.comtil@lemmy.world
minus-squaretherealjcdenton@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down12·edit-22 years agoThere are still laws and it has stability so no it’s not
minus-squareUnmapped@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down1·2 years agoAnarchy means no rulers. No hierarchy. There would still be rules/laws.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 years agoAnarchy isn’t a rejection of structure, but a complex web of horizontal structures.
minus-squarechobeat@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoCommenting with no clue what people are talking about
There are still laws and it has stability so no it’s not
Anarchy means no rulers. No hierarchy. There would still be rules/laws.
Anarchy isn’t a rejection of structure, but a complex web of horizontal structures.
Commenting with no clue what people are talking about