Apparently, stealing other people’s work to create product for money is now “fair use” as according to OpenAI because they are “innovating” (stealing). Yeah. Move fast and break things, huh?

“Because copyright today covers virtually every sort of human expression—including blogposts, photographs, forum posts, scraps of software code, and government documents—it would be impossible to train today’s leading AI models without using copyrighted materials,” wrote OpenAI in the House of Lords submission.

OpenAI claimed that the authors in that lawsuit “misconceive[d] the scope of copyright, failing to take into account the limitations and exceptions (including fair use) that properly leave room for innovations like the large language models now at the forefront of artificial intelligence.”

  • flatbield@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    Money is not always the issue. FOSS software for example. Who wants their FOSS software gobbled up by a commercial AI regardless. So there are a variety of issues.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t care if any of my FOSS software is gobbled up by a commercial AI. Someone reading my code isn’t a problem to me. If it were, I wouldn’t publish it openly.

      • sub_o@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 months ago

        I do, especially when someone’s profiting from it, while my license is strictly for non commercial.