…despite the fact that, for example, Flash was proprietary and they, especially now, provide all their products by subscription?

    • labbbb@thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Okay, but why then do they continue to support Magento (Community Edition) as open source?

      • bugsmith@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 months ago

        The same reason a lot of companies support a community edition. It means that people can use, learn and become experienced with the product without forking over a tonne of money.

        This results in a larger number of developers, add-ons and community surrounding the product.

        This makes it a more appealing product for companies looking to build a business using it.

        It’s the same reason you can use AWS for free, get some JetBrains products for free and often find community editions for similar products to Magento.

        • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          It also prevents competition.

          Locking down Magneto would have resulted in a fork that could grow to rival the product Adobe now owns. With a community edition, the community has less incentive to fork. You can still use the product, and surely that will never ever change, so why bother getting to work on a competing fork?

          Then years down the line, when no competition has come to exist, when the industry has grown dependent on the product, they can start strangling the community edition.

  • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Why do Corpos allow People to work for free to improve their product?” - OP, evidently.