It’s a fun graphic, but it’s difficult/problematic to map the complicated fog of ideology onto a discrete, fixed categorization.

(My pet peeve… As someone who’s skeptical of mutualism, why is it on there twice?)

I believe that a graph overviewing different approaches to societal ferns should count those that states explicitly how society should be bound together. Anarcho feminism and anarcho primitivsim would then not qualify because two different anarcho feminist societies could be implemented drastically different and likewise with anarcho primitivism. They could then be democratic confederalists, anarcho communists, syndicalists or zapatistas.

We should rather treat these as frames of anarchism. The feminist frame, ableism frame, jineoloji frame, food security frame, primitivist frame, queer frame. unmight frame, jamstand frame and so on. These constructs a framework that grounds our reasoning and makes us better suited in understanding what we should expect from society, and thus also the societal fern.

By making this distinction, we make it easier to explore anarchist ideas and encourage picking a societal fern.

Found this higher quality chart by doing reverse image search, in case people wanna zoom into it

This graphic is incomplete. You can help by expanding it.

I didn’t see the group I associate with. It’s the only one that’s 100% correct.