• Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Sure, because depression and trauma clearly must be due to the smartphone. It’s not like the smartphone might be the escape route and you’re now locking the child in to whatever caused the trauma (most likely either school, domestic violence or loss / isolation).

      Not saying it can’t possibly be cyber-bullying or the s̶o̶c̶i̶a̶l̶ ̶a̶l̶g̶o̶r̶i̶t̶h̶m̶ manipulation engine, but just blindly taking away the things your child is escaping into the most is a shortcut to either an estranged or dead one.

      • derAbsender@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        So the if the Phone is an escape and escapes are a-okay, when are we arguing in favor of drugs for children?

        Shouldnt it be both: limiting or prohibiting escapes for children and therapy?

        Otherwise you are adding a damaging coping mechanism to untreated trauma.

        Edit

        The Argument that the Smartphone causing Depression is wrong. Sometimes. But most things on the Smartphone are essentially malevolent in some way.

        • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Wow, equating a child’s coping mechanism and trauma escapes with giving them drugs is a low that’s genuinely impressive. And infuriating.

          I never said anything against therapy, that’s of course essential. So is making sure there is no immediately harmful stuff around them (which entertainment, games and social interactions via internet that are used to cope are NOT fucking part of). But taking away their coping mechanism is literally the worst thing you can do and will only inflict even more damage.

          I went through this fucking shit two decades ago (but with 2000’s computer & internet) and I’ll die on this hill. Implying that a phone is inherently damaging is regurgitated boomer bullshit, and taking it away if it’s their coping mechanism / outlet completely from a traumatized child will lead to either estrangement later or suicide earlier.

  • shameless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    See, the thing is if you take a kids phone away you need to do something else with them to replace that time and habit.

  • wraekscadu@vargar.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    A class of human population without voting rights is a class that’s always subservient to the one that does.

  • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I mean, if I had kids they sure as hell wouldnt have any google or apple device and no access to anything Meta. A 15 year old laptop with Linux (commodore OS would be pretty sick as a kid, I’d have LOVED it) with either none or very limited internet access. No Tok, no fb, no insta.

    Or, some books. Do kids read anymore?

    I know, I’d be the greatest parent of all time, but thats not gonna happen 🙃

    • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Note on the book : You have to let THEM chose what to read based on the genre and plot.

      Otherwise it’s equivalent to someone else making you watch stereotypical tiktok stuff.

      Personal tastes differ.

    • Someone@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Sounds reasonable except that kids will notice the technology around them and start questioning you and using the technology in your back; so you have to teach them with lower doses…