I thought data caps for home internet were a thing of the past…

I’ve somewhat recently moved back to a very rural area of the Midwest. Small town. No stop lights. Biggest businesses other than the bars are Casey’s, Subway, and Dollar General.

And we have one ISP (not counting DSL) — Mediacom. When we first signed up, I had to go with the second service tier. But not because of speeds, but so I could have a reasonable 1 TB/mo data cap.

Lucky me, they increased the cap to 1.5 TB. 🙄

I hope that in my lifetime I can see ISPs regulated as a public utility.

  • SirMaple_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Data caps on home internet services should be illegal. They should also be much higher on mobile, but that’s a whole other topic.

    I have 940/940 Unlimited FTTH for $93.45(Canadian).

      • Awwab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        What average consumer has hardware that’s actually capable of using more than 1Gbps?

        • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Average none, though 2.5 Gbps is getting more and more common and WiFi is catching up too. You could max out multiple slower devices at the same time without hitting the limit of your uplink. I don’t have a use case for that, so I’d only upgrade from my current 1 Gbps to higher speeds if the price is comparable. That doesn’t mean that others don’t have a use case for it.

        • theoc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most decent to higher end desktops have at least 2.5 Gbps. Even a laptop/desktop that doesn’t can get a 2.5 Gbps usb-c to ethernet dongle for like $30-$40.

          Higher end access points also have 2.5 Gbps. I have no issue maxing out my 1.5 Gbps (ISP over provisions the lines so I get 1.7 gbps) on Steam. Also keep in mind that when you have a faster connection with multiple devices/people, each device/person might be able to pull 1 Gbps. As in if you have 2 Gbps internet service even 2 older computers that only have a gigabit internet connection, each could get the full gigabit to them.

          If you’re the type of person that only uses wifi, you won’t see a difference between gigabit and multigigabit connections but plenty of people have ethernet throughout their homes and they make use of faster than gigabit connections.

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          2.5GbE and 5GbE is now in average consumer hardware. Also 10GbE router costs about 100$.

    • theoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re way overpaying. I pay $40 for 1.5 Gbps with Bell FTTH. Give them a call and say it’s too expensive and see what they can do for you. Or tell them Rogers (if they’re in your area) offered you 1.5gbps for $60 and ask if they can beat that.

      As for mobile, you should look at new plans. $39 gets you 20 GB $50 gets you 40 GB. Seems like plenty of data imo https://www.koodomobile.com/en/rate-plans?INTCMP=KM_HDD_2023_Plans_RatePlans_40gbfor45_ROC_MBSK

      Best time to get a mobile plan is Black Friday, should be even better deals by then.

  • Dettweiler@lemmyonline.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Home internet data caps WERE a thing of the past when Obama appointed Tom Wheeler as FCC chairman, who then pushed rulings to classify ISPs as a public utility and started enforcing net neutrality. Companies that didn’t play ball started getting fined until they fell in line. Being a former executive for a major ISP, he was very familiar with the anti-competitive practices and underhanded tricks those companies had been using for years; and he used those practices against them to finally make some pro-consumer progress for internet access in the US.

    Then, Trump came in and put Ajit Pai in charge of the FCC (no joke, my phone kept auto correcting his name to Shit Pie). Anyways, Shit Pie tore down those rulings and undid all those years of progress as part of the Trump administration’s anti-Obama initiative. Even though it was proven time and again that what he did was directly against public opinion, and that ISPs were flooding the public commentary with bot posts(some even made by dead people); Shit Pie continued to meme about himself and drink from an obnoxiously large Reese’s coffee mug while doing so. At this point, every provider of internet services has added back data caps in the US, and they have continued to increase their prices to maintain that 99.9% profit margin. They’ve also locked down more areas to prevent municipal broadband services from forming, and they’re even pushing for legislation to prevent them from ever happening.

    The current administration has done absolutely nothing. In fact, they’ve been so unremarkable, I have no idea who is in charge of the FCC, and I don’t feel like looking it up.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have luckily never heard about data caps in Scandinavia except for mobile broadband.

      Do they even exist at all, here?

      • croizat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had a friend years ago that had a cap, but that was literally the only one I’ve heard of in my life here (Sweden)

      • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My first (fast) internet connection was 1 Mbit.

        We had 1gb to download per month. This cap disappeared when more competitors showed up though (i had that cap around … 2001)

        I havnt seen a data cap for internet connections since. I am not aware of any either. Except for mobile phones. Though, they also have unlimited data for those , if you want. (I have. Just so i never have to worry about it ever again)

    • kristoff@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Australia looks like an interesting case. Iknow that in some countries, ISPs have to provide service to both urban and rural customers at the same price, which means that urban customers actually subsidize people living in rural areas. In some other cases, the gouvernements help pay for this.

      Isn’t there a project in Australia that the federal gouvernement is subsidizing the role-out of fibre?

      • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have no idea, but that idea didn’t work out all that well in the US. The gov provided funding for expansion to the countryside for all the major telecoms…and they just pocketed without actually implementing anything.

      • scarilog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk but pricing in Australia is fucked. The fibre network isn’t that large to begin with afaik, and even if you do have fibre you have to pay an arm and a leg for good speeds.

        E.g. I pay like $70 USD a month for 100/40.

        Symmetric gigabit costs several hundred a month, they’re not intended for residential customers.

  • fne8w2ah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    $40 for 2 Gbps unlimited in Singapore. Caps on home broadband are frankly nonsensical.

  • rizoid@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was very close to closing on a house in rural midwest but I checked isp’s and every one available had caps so I just stayed away.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s why you just get a business line, usually just slightly more expensive, and you get 99.9% SLA uptime and unlimited cap.

    • LogicBomb ⚙️💣@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Great internet is also a deciding factor for us while looking for our next rural midwest home! I use the FCC Broadband Map and availability searches on local ISP websites to confirm available speeds and no data caps. We passed on some great homes because of slow/no internet or data caps.

      Our current rural midwest home has 940x35 w/o data caps from a cable-based (DOCSIS 3.1) ISP for $34.99/month. I’m sure they will increase the price after 12 months. When the time comes, I’ll call them again to complain and get a decent price again.

    • Jikal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good choice. I live in the rural midwest and the only thing that’ll reach (even though we’re in the flatlands) is a WISP we pay $170 a month for 12/6. No data caps, but it’s slow as shit. At least it’s not satellite so we can still play games online fairly reliably but damn.

  • z3bra@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m reading all the comments and I’m shocked… In France, with uncapped access and 1Gbps down/600Mbps up (theorical) I pay 40€/mo (30€ every six month when I call to complain that it’s too expensive). And it’s definitely not the cheapest provider.

    That’s insane !

    • lidstah@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      1Gbps down/700Mbps up here, 35€/month (another french provider), no data caps - for 5 bucks/month more I could have 5Gbps down/1Gbps up, but… well, my home network is still using 1Gbps switches - but all the cabling was built with 10Gbps in mind.

      Data caps are pure robbery. We run a non-profit ISP/hosting platform and a non-profit IXP with friends in West France, the only thing you pay (and the only thing end users should have to pay) is goddamn bandwidth.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Interesting that they give you more up than down. Are you on a server plan or something like that?

      Edit: lol just noticed what community this is, server plan makes more sense now.

  • vojel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In Germany we pay lots of money for 5G data volume. For me I got 20 Gigs for about 40 bucks, this is mostly Not a thing in the rest of Europe. But data plans on landlines are really dumb.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well mobile data is very different. With fibre optic you can generally keep provisioning more cables and a single cable already carries a huge amount already.

        Radio has an absolute efficiency limit for the bandwidth of a signal and we’re pretty damn close to that now.

        5g uses wider bandwidth channels, with more cells closer together and uses things like beamforming. But there’s still always going to be an upper limit that is considerably lower than fibre.

        This is why they likely want to discourage 5g becoming a full alternative to wired, because there’s just not the capacity to do it on the same scale.

      • cmeerw@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you really think about it, caps on mobile data are also fairly stupid

        Mobile is a shared medium and can only support a certain amount of bandwidth per phone mast (in a certain area). A mobile phone network heavily relies on most users not using their data plans most of the time.

      • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In France at least I doubt it.

        The only time I remember caps on landlines was when 56k modem were still the norm. Once ADSL was rolled out there was pretty much no caps anymore.

        I think the fact that we had some healthy competition for landlines from the get go in my country meant the ISPs couldn’t get that much greedy and put caps in place. So it never ended being common where I live.

        And when it was old school modems, well you were already paying for the phone communications anyway when connected to the internet so it wasn’t really unlimited anyway.

        • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, I’m in portugal, which does NOT have a lot of healthy competition in the communication space, and as far as I remember there haven’t been data caps (I’m 18, so last 10 years is what I reasonably remember regarding being online), so I’ve always assumed it had to be some European level law

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Data caps do exist in Europe, but they’re generally reserved for ultra cheap data plans. Something like €5 for 100mbit speeds. So you get a decent connection, but limited in traffic instead. Which makes sense.

      • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. In the past you would pay for calling and text messages and data was often unlimited at the higher tiers, but since nobody pays extra for calling and texting anymore, they’re now charging for data. Luckily they can’t charge extra for EU roaming anymore.

        Data caps on landlines is something that I haven’t seen for a very long time in my EU country. The last time I had a subscription with a data cap must have been with a 56k modem, if at all. Cable and DSL might have had fair use policies back in the day (or maybe they still do, who knows), but no hard cap. Or at least not that I can remember.

        Internet nowadays is way too important to have data caps, especially at home. 5G should definitely be next. Differentiate in speed all you want, but ditch the caps.

        • veloxy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are still plans with data caps in Belgium, this is limited to the “cheapest” plans though at about 30 EUR a month

      • koper@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        While it’s stupid that ISPs are using their monopolies to screw consumers, the concept of data caps is not as stupid as you might think.

        You’re not just paying for the connection between you and the ISP, but also all the other data links that get your internet traffic to its destination. For example, those cables across the ocean are owned third parties and they charge money for every byte that goes through. It wouldn’t be unreasonable for ISPs to pass that cost to users.

        Furthermore, most links are overprovisioned in order to keep costs down. For example, if you assume that users only use 10% of their bandwidth on average, that means you can fit 10x as many people on a connection (or maybe 8x to account for peaks). This does mean that users should be discouraged from using their full bandwidth for long durations, otherwise the network operators can’t overprovision as much and have to invest more in infrastructure.

    • clb92@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In Denmark, I pay ~19€ (~$21) for 1000GB of mobile data (they call it ‘unlimited’, but the small text says they may cut you off at 1000GB). Of course, I rarely use more than 50GB a month on my phone.

      • vojel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is what I am talking about … Most countries in Europe just gives you kinda unlimited data plans… look at this crap I rarely need mobile data because I work from home but if my landline has an interruption I can barely work 1 or 2 days with that if I tweak data consumption on my work laptop.

      • ogeist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        weint auf deutsch

        I’m moving to another provider next month to increase from 8GB@€30 to 15GB€25… Those are per month…

    • Redredme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Pretty much a thing in NL and afaik also BE.

      source: am Dutch.

      T mobile NL, 5G capped at 22GB. Cost: 20 euro.

      35 euro in NL wl give you t mobile unlimited which is capped at 15 GB per day. Other providers charge more or less the same.

      @home internet 1up/down GB fiber 45 euro. No datacap.

  • voxel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    lol uncapped 500mbps fiber (actual fiber directly to your house) connection is 10-12$/month in Ukraine

  • Baku@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looking at all you guys with your gigabit connections, meanwhile I’m in Aus and lucky to get 30 down and 15 up

  • Xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where I am, there was only one provider of internet for a long time, and I was paying for a plan that’s more or less what you have right now. Then another company came in and laid fiber, and both companies slashed prices and now I get over double my download speed, no data cap, and something crazy like 50x the old upload speed all for like 20 dollars less a month! Before I switched to the fiber company, the first company even increased my download speeds without increasing the price! Anyone who says competition doesn’t change things is crazy.

  • CatTrickery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I live in the UK and currently have copper cable at about 60mbps for £60 per month. I thought what I had was bad because I have a friend who gets 1gbps for £30 a few miles away.

        • fox2263@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So it’s my impression that (and my knowledge might be out of date here) but almost anywhere that BT is then there should be at least 1 other company that operates on their lines (or rather Openreaches line, after they were split out of BT for competition purposes) so you should be able to get someone else with luck.

          Try using Sam knows website and they tell lots about your line and what you can get.

    • art101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where the hell in the UK are you? I’m in the North and pay £26 for 60mbps but get more like 70 due to how close I am to the street cabinet though I haven’t even got copper cable here, just crappy aluminium that is so old I think Alexander Graham Bell himself fitted them.

      • CatTrickery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m in the north-west but I’m limited to BT because nobody else has cables down yet. A different company claims to be fitting FttP round here in a few months though.

        • art101@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Similar issue here, full fibre roll out is estimated to be complete in 2025.

          I’m just outside Newcastle on the coast and could get Virgin but my neighbours have had a nightmare with it.

          They only rolled out their fibre about three months ago so there might be issues with that

  • brenno@lemmy.brennoflavio.com.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    In Brazil I pay 20 USD for 500mb. There are plans in my area that sells 1gb for 30 USD. Thay can’t put data caps due to legislation, only on mobile data (which I pay 6usd for 20gb cap, 5g)

    • Dagnet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe some have data caps even for landline internet, they get around legislation saying you get slower Internet after you reach the cap but yeah, I pay like 25 USD for 600 mps down and 300 mps up

        • Dagnet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Says they will decide on it, has there been a permanent decision? Not trying to start an argument just wondering how this works

          • ProzacGabriel@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They might bring it up back someday (it was “filed”), and a company could try bringing it before a judge claiming it is unfair to them.

            But, as things stand, challenging it would be a very unpopular maneuver for anyone involved, there is no political or economical lobby for it, so there is no reason to be afraid of it being changed short term.

            • Dagnet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I see, thx for the info. I hope it’s not something that can be changed be presidential decree like when bolsonaro ended the 2x 32kg bag allowance we had for absolutely no reason