This sounds like something Lemmy would also really benefit from.

  • Steve
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Lemmy has it (or did) already. Some instances use it, many don’t.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      No, there is only a very basic option that implements maybe a third of what Pixelfed does now.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Did you read the entire blog post?

          Lemmy’s system gives no feedback to applicants at all and is a single input field that offers no guided onboarding what so ever. It’s not even a proof of concept compared to what the blog post describes for Pixelfed.

          • ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yes, however without experience with Lemmy’s implementation, it wasn’t clear what the differences were. From what I’ve read of Lemmy’s basic implementation, i.e. submit a reason with your registration/application, this didn’t sound that far from it.

            As I read it, Pixelfed’s request for more information form is a good addition (better than the awkward roundabout way you’d have to handle it otherwise, as I think I recall seeing come up with Lemmy), albeit as it’s optional we’ll have to see how well it’s used in practice.