Let’s get the AMAs kicked off on Lemmy, shall we. Almost ten years ago now, I
wrote RFC 7168 [https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7168], “Hypertext Coffeepot
Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances” which extends HTCPCP
[https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2324] to handle tea brewing. Both Coffeepot
Control Protocol and the tea-brewing extension are joke Internet Standards, and
were released on Apr 1st (1998 and 2014). You may be familiar with HTTP error
418, “I’m a teapot”; this comes from the 1998 standard. I’m giving a talk on the
history of HTTP and HTCPCP at the WeAreDevelopers World Congress in Berlin later
this month, and I need an FAQ section; AMA about the Internet and HTTP. Let’s
try this out!
No, it only suggests an additional field in the Post table
since there’s no assurance that any instance is aware of any other instance
It already works like that, but slightly worse because post IDs aren’t the same across instances. If you search a newly-created community from another instance here, you just won’t find it until it’s synced, despite its URI being unique.
Thinking about it, it would be possible to have an URI for posts like post:${id}@instance.com, similar to how user URIs and community URIs are made. This way, you could open /post/1772651 on lemmy.world or post:1772651@lemmy.world on, idk, lemmy.blahaj.zone or something.
No, it only suggests an additional field in the
PosttableIt already works like that, but slightly worse because post IDs aren’t the same across instances. If you search a newly-created community from another instance here, you just won’t find it until it’s synced, despite its URI being unique.
Thinking about it, it would be possible to have an URI for posts like
post:${id}@instance.com, similar to how user URIs and community URIs are made. This way, you could open/post/1772651on lemmy.world orpost:1772651@lemmy.worldon, idk, lemmy.blahaj.zone or something.